Literature DB >> 26101281

Cognitive neuroscience in forensic science: understanding and utilizing the human element.

Itiel E Dror1.   

Abstract

The human element plays a critical role in forensic science. It is not limited only to issues relating to forensic decision-making, such as bias, but also relates to most aspects of forensic work (some of which even take place before a crime is ever committed or long after the verification of the forensic conclusion). In this paper, I explicate many aspects of forensic work that involve the human element and therefore show the relevance (and potential contribution) of cognitive neuroscience to forensic science. The 10 aspects covered in this paper are proactive forensic science, selection during recruitment, training, crime scene investigation, forensic decision-making, verification and conflict resolution, reporting, the role of the forensic examiner, presentation in court and judicial decisions. As the forensic community is taking on the challenges introduced by the realization that the human element is critical for forensic work, new opportunities emerge that allow for considerable improvement and enhancement of the forensic science endeavour.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bias; cognitive forensics; decision-making; expertise; forensic science; human factors

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26101281      PMCID: PMC4581000          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  20 in total

1.  The impact of human-technology cooperation and distributed cognition in forensic science: biasing effects of AFIS contextual information on human experts.

Authors:  Itiel E Dror; Kasey Wertheim; Peter Fraser-Mackenzie; Jeff Walajtys
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 1.832

2.  Letter to the editor--Combating bias: the next step in fighting cognitive and psychological contamination.

Authors:  Itiel Dror
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.832

3.  The vision in "blind" justice: expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition.

Authors:  Itiel E Dror; Simon A Cole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

4.  Playing dice with criminal sentences: the influence of irrelevant anchors on experts' judicial decision making.

Authors:  Birte Englich; Thomas Mussweiler; Fritz Strack
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-02

5.  The nature of forensic science opinion--a possible framework to guide thinking and practice in investigations and in court proceedings.

Authors:  G Jackson; S Jones; G Booth; C Champod; I W Evett
Journal:  Sci Justice       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  Forensic science does not start in the lab: the concept of diagnostic field tests.

Authors:  Joseph Almog
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.832

7.  Context effects and observer bias--implications for forensic odontology.

Authors:  Mark Page; Jane Taylor; Matt Blenkin
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 1.832

8.  Perception problems of the verbal scale.

Authors:  Carrie Mullen; Danielle Spence; Linda Moxey; Allan Jamieson
Journal:  Sci Justice       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.124

9.  Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias.

Authors:  Sherry Nakhaeizadeh; Itiel E Dror; Ruth M Morgan
Journal:  Sci Justice       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  Proactive forensic science: a novel class of cathinone precursors.

Authors:  E Smolianitski; E Wolf; J Almog
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 2.395

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The logical foundations of forensic science: towards reliable knowledge.

Authors:  Ian Evett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  The charm of structural neuroimaging in insanity evaluations: guidelines to avoid misinterpretation of the findings.

Authors:  C Scarpazza; S Ferracuti; A Miolla; G Sartori
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 6.222

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.