OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived thin-cap fibroatheroma (IDTCFA) and its relationship with the clinical presentation using spectral analysis of IVUS radiofrequency data (IVUS-Virtual Histology [IVUS-VH]). BACKGROUND: Thin-cap fibroatheroma lesions are the most prevalent substrate of plaque rupture. METHODS: In 55 patients, a non-culprit, non-obstructive (<50%) lesion was investigated with IVUS-VH. We classified IDTCFA lesions as focal, necrotic core-rich (> or =10% of the cross-sectional area) plaques being in contact with the lumen; IDTCFA definition required a percent atheroma volume (PAV) > or =40%. RESULTS: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n = 23) patients presented a significantly higher prevalence of IDTCFA than stable (n = 32) patients (3.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.0 to 5.0] vs. 1.0 [IQR 0.0 to 2.8], p = 0.018). No relation was found between patient's characteristics such as gender (p = 0.917), diabetes (p = 0.217), smoking (p = 0.904), hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.663), hypertension (p = 0.251), or family history of coronary heart disease (p = 0.136) and the presence of IDTCFA. A clear clustering pattern was seen along the coronaries, with 35 (35.4%), 31 (31.3%), 19 (19.2%), and 14 (14.1%) IDTCFAs in the first 10 mm, 11 to 20 mm, 21 to 30 mm, and > or =31 mm segments, respectively, p = 0.008. Finally, we compared the severity (mean PAV 56.9 +/- 7.4 vs. 54.8 +/- 6.0, p = 0.343) and the composition (mean percent necrotic core 19.7 +/- 4.1 vs. 18.1 +/- 3.0, p = 0.205) of IDTCFAs between stable and ACS patients, and no significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: In this in vivo study, IVUS-VH identified IDTCFA as a more prevalent finding in ACS than in stable angina patients.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived thin-cap fibroatheroma (IDTCFA) and its relationship with the clinical presentation using spectral analysis of IVUS radiofrequency data (IVUS-Virtual Histology [IVUS-VH]). BACKGROUND: Thin-cap fibroatheroma lesions are the most prevalent substrate of plaque rupture. METHODS: In 55 patients, a non-culprit, non-obstructive (<50%) lesion was investigated with IVUS-VH. We classified IDTCFA lesions as focal, necrotic core-rich (> or =10% of the cross-sectional area) plaques being in contact with the lumen; IDTCFA definition required a percent atheroma volume (PAV) > or =40%. RESULTS: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n = 23) patients presented a significantly higher prevalence of IDTCFA than stable (n = 32) patients (3.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.0 to 5.0] vs. 1.0 [IQR 0.0 to 2.8], p = 0.018). No relation was found between patient's characteristics such as gender (p = 0.917), diabetes (p = 0.217), smoking (p = 0.904), hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.663), hypertension (p = 0.251), or family history of coronary heart disease (p = 0.136) and the presence of IDTCFA. A clear clustering pattern was seen along the coronaries, with 35 (35.4%), 31 (31.3%), 19 (19.2%), and 14 (14.1%) IDTCFAs in the first 10 mm, 11 to 20 mm, 21 to 30 mm, and > or =31 mm segments, respectively, p = 0.008. Finally, we compared the severity (mean PAV 56.9 +/- 7.4 vs. 54.8 +/- 6.0, p = 0.343) and the composition (mean percent necrotic core 19.7 +/- 4.1 vs. 18.1 +/- 3.0, p = 0.205) of IDTCFAs between stable and ACS patients, and no significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: In this in vivo study, IVUS-VH identified IDTCFA as a more prevalent finding in ACS than in stable anginapatients.
Authors: Lorenzo Hernando; Cecilia Corros; Nieves Gonzalo; Rosana Hernández-Antolin; Camino Bañuelos; Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo; Esther Bernardo; Antonio Fernández-Ortiz; Javier Escaned; Carlos Macaya; Fernando Alfonso Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-04-21 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Michiel A de Graaf; Joella E van Velzen; Fleur R de Graaf; Joanne D Schuijf; Jouke Dijkstra; Jeroen J Bax; Johan H C Reiber; Martin J Schalij; Ernst E van der Wall; J Wouter Jukema Journal: Heart Vessels Date: 2012-02-18 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Shann S Yu; Ryan A Ortega; Brendan W Reagan; John A McPherson; Hak-Joon Sung; Todd D Giorgio Journal: Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol Date: 2011-08-10
Authors: Andreas Koops; Harald Ittrich; Susan Petri; Andrew Priest; Alexander Stork; Ute Lockemann; Gerhard Adam; Christoph Weber Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-04-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Gastón A Rodriguez-Granillo; Sophia Vaina; Héctor M García-García; Marco Valgimigli; Eric Duckers; Robert J van Geuns; Evelyn Regar; William J van der Giessen; Marco Bressers; Dick Goedhart; Marie-Angele Morel; Pim J de Feyter; Patrick W Serruys Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2006-03-31 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Stanley Chia; O Christopher Raffel; Masamichi Takano; Guillermo J Tearney; Brett E Bouma; Ik-Kyung Jang Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2008-05-05 Impact factor: 5.602