Literature DB >> 16323961

Purine loading, stem-loops and Chargaff's second parity rule: a discussion of the application of elementary principles to early chemical observations.

Donald R Forsdyke1, Sheldon J Bell.   

Abstract

DNA base compositions were determined chemically long before sequencing technologies permitted the direct counting of bases. Some recent observations made using modern sequencing technologies could have been deduced by application of elementary principles to early chemical observations. This paper draws attention to the fact that the potential for significant stem-loop structure is a general property of single-stranded DNA (genic and non-genic) and hence for any corresponding transcripts, whether they function by virtue of their structure (eg rRNA) or as mRNA. Furthermore, there is Chargaff's second parity rule: in single strands, the percentage of purines approximately equals the percentage of pyrimidines. Since, in stems, purines match pyrimidines, Szybalski's rule that transcripts violate the second parity rule in favour of purines, must apply to loops. Since purine loading occurs in both mesophilic and thermophilic species, genes with transcripts that need stable secondary structures for functioning at high temperatures must achieve this by selectively increasing the GC percentage (GC%) of stems, while retaining purine loading of loops. Arguments that purine loading is specific for the loops of RNA-synonymous strands of genes whose transcripts function by virtue of their secondary structure (ie rRNAs, not mRNAs) need to take into account, as controls, the loop regions of mRNA-synonymous strands. Entire genes, or entire genomes where gene orientation is not considered, are not appropriate controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 16323961     DOI: 10.2165/00822942-200403010-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1175-5636


  10 in total

1.  Asymptotically increasing compliance of genomes with Chargaff's second parity rules through inversions and inverted transpositions.

Authors:  Guenter Albrecht-Buehler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  DNA sequence symmetries from randomness: the origin of the Chargaff's second parity rule.

Authors:  Piero Fariselli; Cristian Taccioli; Luca Pagani; Amos Maritan
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  Genomic and proteomic adaptations to growth at high temperature.

Authors:  Donal A Hickey; Gregory A C Singer
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 13.583

4.  Microbial lifestyle and genome signatures.

Authors:  Chitra Dutta; Sandip Paul
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.236

Review 5.  Neutralism versus selectionism: Chargaff's second parity rule, revisited.

Authors:  Donald R Forsdyke
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 1.633

6.  Inverse symmetry in complete genomes and whole-genome inverse duplication.

Authors:  Sing-Guan Kong; Wen-Lang Fan; Hong-Da Chen; Zi-Ting Hsu; Nengji Zhou; Bo Zheng; Hoong-Chien Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A blueprint for a mutationist theory of replicative strand asymmetries formation.

Authors:  Vladislav V Khrustalev; Eugene V Barkovsky
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.236

8.  Hidden chromosome symmetry: in silico transformation reveals symmetry in 2D DNA walk trajectories of 671 chromosomes.

Authors:  Maria S Poptsova; Sergei A Larionov; Eugeny V Ryadchenko; Sergei D Rybalko; Ilya A Zakharov; Alexander Loskutov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Is the Efficiency of RNA Silencing Evolutionarily Regulated?

Authors:  Kumiko Ui-Tei
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  The exceptional genomic word symmetry along DNA sequences.

Authors:  Vera Afreixo; João M O S Rodrigues; Carlos A C Bastos; Raquel M Silva
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.