Literature DB >> 17093051

Asymptotically increasing compliance of genomes with Chargaff's second parity rules through inversions and inverted transpositions.

Guenter Albrecht-Buehler1.   

Abstract

Chargaff's second parity rules for mononucleotides and oligonucleotides (CIImono and CIIoligo rules) state that a sufficiently long (> 100 kb) strand of genomic DNA that contains N copies of a mono- or oligonucleotide, also contains N copies of its reverse complementary mono- or oligonucleotide on the same strand. There is very strong support in the literature for the validity of the rules in coding and noncoding regions, especially for the CIImono rule. Because the experimental support for the CIIoligo rule is much less complete, the present article, focusing on the special case of trinucleotides (triplets), examined several gigabases of genome sequences from a wide range of species and kingdoms including organelles such as mitochondria and chloroplasts. I found that all genomes, with the only exception of certain mitochondria, complied with the CIItriplet rule at a very high level of accuracy in coding and noncoding regions alike. Based on the growing evidence that genomes may contain up to millions of copies of interspersed repetitive elements, I propose in this article a quantitative formulation of the hypothesis that inversions and inverted transposition could be a major contributing if not dominant factor in the almost universal validity of the rules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17093051      PMCID: PMC1635160          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0605553103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  21 in total

Review 1.  Mitochondrial genome evolution and the origin of eukaryotes.

Authors:  B F Lang; M W Gray; G Burger
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Genetical implications of the structure of deoxyribonucleic acid.

Authors:  J D WATSON; F H CRICK
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1953-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Deviations from Chargaff's second parity rule correlate with direction of transcription.

Authors:  S J Bell; D R Forsdyke
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1999-03-07       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  The significance of responses of the genome to challenge.

Authors:  B McClintock
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-11-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A test of Chargaff's second rule.

Authors:  David Mitchell; Robert Bridge
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 6.  Purine loading, stem-loops and Chargaff's second parity rule: a discussion of the application of elementary principles to early chemical observations.

Authors:  Donald R Forsdyke; Sheldon J Bell
Journal:  Appl Bioinformatics       Date:  2004

7.  Transposon-free regions in mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Cas Simons; Michael Pheasant; Igor V Makunin; John S Mattick
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  The structures of mouse and human L1 elements reflect their insertion mechanism.

Authors:  S L Martin; W-L P Li; A V Furano; S Boissinot
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.636

9.  CORE-SINEs: eukaryotic short interspersed retroposing elements with common sequence motifs.

Authors:  N Gilbert; D Labuda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Relative roles of primary sequence and (G + C)% in determining the hierarchy of frequencies of complementary trinucleotide pairs in DNAs of different species.

Authors:  D R Forsdyke
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.395

View more
  21 in total

1.  Revisiting the Relationships Between Genomic G + C Content, RNA Secondary Structures, and Optimal Growth Temperature.

Authors:  Michelle M Meyer
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  New views on strand asymmetry in insect mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Shu-Jun Wei; Min Shi; Xue-Xin Chen; Michael J Sharkey; Cornelis van Achterberg; Gong-Yin Ye; Jun-Hua He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  DNA sequence symmetries from randomness: the origin of the Chargaff's second parity rule.

Authors:  Piero Fariselli; Cristian Taccioli; Luca Pagani; Amos Maritan
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  RNA landscape of evolution for optimal exon and intron discrimination.

Authors:  Chaolin Zhang; Wen-Hsiung Li; Adrian R Krainer; Michael Q Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A study in entire chromosomes of violations of the intra-strand parity of complementary nucleotides (Chargaff's second parity rule).

Authors:  B R Powdel; Siddhartha Sankar Satapathy; Aditya Kumar; Pankaj Kumar Jha; Alak Kumar Buragohain; Munindra Borah; Suvendra Kumar Ray
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 4.458

6.  Inverse symmetry in complete genomes and whole-genome inverse duplication.

Authors:  Sing-Guan Kong; Wen-Lang Fan; Hong-Da Chen; Zi-Ting Hsu; Nengji Zhou; Bo Zheng; Hoong-Chien Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Two common profiles exist for genomic oligonucleotide frequencies.

Authors:  Shang-Hong Zhang; Lei Wang
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-11-17

8.  Evolutionary implications of inversions that have caused intra-strand parity in DNA.

Authors:  Kohji Okamura; John Wei; Stephen W Scherer
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Properties and distribution of pure GA-sequences of mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Guenter Albrecht-Buehler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Conservation vs. variation of dinucleotide frequencies across bacterial and archaeal genomes: evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; Peng Li; Hong-Sheng Zhong; Shang-Hong Zhang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.