Literature DB >> 16320034

Pain assessment.

Mathias Haefeli1, Achim Elfering.   

Abstract

Pain usually is the major complaint of patients with problems of the back, thus making pain evaluation a fundamental requisite in the outcome assessment in spinal surgery. Pain intensity, pain-related disability, pain duration and pain affect are the aspects that define pain and its effects. For each of these aspects, different assessment instruments exist and are discussed in terms of advantages and disadvantages. Risk factors for the development of chronic pain have been a major topic in pain research in the past two decades. Now, it has been realised that psychological and psychosocial factors may substantially influence pain perception in patients with chronic pain and thus may influence the surgical outcome. With this background, pain acceptance, pain tolerance and pain-related anxiety as factors influencing coping strategies are discussed. Finally, a recommendation for a minimum as well as for a more comprehensive pain assessment is given.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16320034      PMCID: PMC3454549          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-1044-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  76 in total

1.  Passive coping is a risk factor for disabling neck or low back pain.

Authors:  Annalyn C Mercado; Linda J Carroll; J David Cassidy; Pierre Côté
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Paul Karoly; Sanford Braver
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Behavioral dimensions of adjustment in persons with chronic pain: pain-related anxiety and acceptance.

Authors:  L M McCracken; I L Spertus; A S Janeck; D Sinclair; F T Wetzel
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  A case-control study of psychological and psychosocial risk factors for shoulder and neck pain at the workplace.

Authors:  O Vasseljen; R H Westgaard; S Larsen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales.

Authors:  D D Price; F M Bush; S Long; S W Harkins
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale.

Authors:  Edgar E Ohnhaus; Rolf Adler
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  [Theories and models of chronicity: on the way to a broader definition of chronic back pain].

Authors:  H Raspe; A Hüppe; C Matthis
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  Invalid use of pain drawings in psychological screening of back pain patients.

Authors:  Carl L Von Baeyer; Kathleen J Bergstrom; Martin G Brodwin; Sandra K Brodwin
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity.

Authors:  K H Todd; K G Funk; J P Funk; R Bonacci
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.721

10.  Development of a questionnaire for the assessment of active and passive coping strategies in chronic pain patients.

Authors:  Gregory K Brown; Perry M Nicassio
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  213 in total

1.  Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of the reliability and validity of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the Brazilian-Portuguese language.

Authors:  L H F Damasceno; P A G Rocha; E S Barbosa; C A M Barros; F T Canto; H L A Defino; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Stochastic resonance whole body vibration reduces musculoskeletal pain: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Achim Elfering; Jan Thomann; Volker Schade; Lorenz Radlinger
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2011-12-18

3.  Postoperative Pain after Treatment Using the GentleWave System: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Daryl Grigsby; Ronald Ordinola-Zapata; Scott B McClanahan; Alex Fok
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 4.  A survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2006.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Low back pain at school: unique risk deriving from unsatisfactory grade in maths and school-type recommendation.

Authors:  Cordula Erne; Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Acute effects of stochastic resonance whole body vibration.

Authors:  Achim Elfering; Jasmine Zahno; Jan Taeymans; Angela Blasimann; Lorenz Radlinger
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-10-18

Review 7.  Epidural steroid compared to placebo injection in sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  E J A Verheijen; C A Bonke; E M J Amorij; C L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty and procedural pain.

Authors:  A Venmans; C A Klazen; P N Lohle; W J van Rooij
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Pain intensity and severe pain in young immigrant patients with long-standing back pain.

Authors:  Monica Löfvander; Marina Taloyan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Assessment of nerve involvement in the lumbar spine: agreement between magnetic resonance imaging, physical examination and pain drawing findings.

Authors:  Bo C Bertilson; Eva Brosjö; Hans Billing; Lars-Erik Strender
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.