Literature DB >> 3696743

Development of a questionnaire for the assessment of active and passive coping strategies in chronic pain patients.

Gregory K Brown1, Perry M Nicassio.   

Abstract

This study describes the development of a self-report questionnaire, the Vanderbilt Pain Management Inventory, which assesses the frequency with which chronic pain patients use active or passive coping strategies when their pain reaches a moderate or greater level of intensity. Two internally reliable scales, Active Coping and Passive Coping, were derived using factor analytic techniques from a sample of 361 rheumatoid arthritis patients. The 2 scales showed an opposite pattern of relationships with criterion measures. While Active Coping was associated with reports of less pain, less depression, less functional impairment, and higher general self-efficacy, Passive Coping was correlated with reports of greater depression, greater pain and flare-up activity, greater functional impairment, and lower general self-efficacy. The relationship of these scales to previous theory and research on coping is presented. These scales appear useful for the assessment of coping strategies in clinical settings and in treatment outcome research on chronic pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3696743     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)90006-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  90 in total

1.  Psychosocial differences in high risk versus low risk acute low-back pain patients.

Authors:  C B Pulliam; R J Gatchel; M A Gardea
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-03

2.  Predicting persistent disabling low back pain in general practice: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gareth T Jones; Ruth E Johnson; Nicola J Wiles; Carol Chaddock; Richard G Potter; Chris Roberts; Deborah P M Symmons; Gary J Macfarlane
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  En las manos de Dios [in God's hands]: Religious and other forms of coping among Latinos with arthritis.

Authors:  Ana F Abraído-Lanza; Elizabeth Vasquez; Sandra E Echeverría
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2004-02

4.  Family histories of breast cancer, coping styles, and psychological adjustment.

Authors:  Youngmee Kim; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-06

5.  Coping, catastrophizing and chronic pain in breast cancer.

Authors:  Scott R Bishop; David Warr
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-06

6.  Relation of cognitive coping and catastrophizing to acute pain and analgesic use following breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  P B Jacobsen; R W Butler
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1996-02

7.  Predictors of positive psychosocial functioning of older adults in residential care facilities.

Authors:  Jeff Y Schanowitz; Perry M Nicassio
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-02-02

Review 8.  Pain assessment.

Authors:  Mathias Haefeli; Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Explaining pain following cancer: a practical guide for clinicians.

Authors:  Jo Nijs; Amarins J Wijma; Laurence Leysen; Roselien Pas; Ward Willaert; Wouter Hoelen; Kelly Ickmans; C Paul van Wilgen
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  The relationship between coping styles in response to unfair treatment and understanding of diabetes self-care.

Authors:  Michelle L Dyke; Yendelela L Cuffee; Jewell H Halanych; Richard H McManus; Carol Curtin; Jeroan J Allison
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.