Literature DB >> 16319242

The dangers of medical ethics.

C Cowley1.   

Abstract

The dominant conception of medical ethics being taught in British and American medical schools is at best pointless and at worst dangerous, or so it will be argued. Although it is laudable that medical schools have now given medical ethics a secure place in the curriculum, they go wrong in treating it like a scientific body of knowledge. Ethics is a unique subject matter precisely because of its widespread familiarity in all areas of life, and any teaching has to start from this shared ethical understanding and from the familiar ethical concepts of ordinary language. Otherwise there is a real risk that spurious technocratic jargon will be deployed by teacher and student alike in the futile search for intellectual respectability, culminating in a misplaced sense of having "done" the ethics module. There are no better examples of such jargon than "consequentialism", "deontology", and the "Four Principles". At best, they cannot do the work they were designed to do and, at worst, they can lead student and practitioner into ignoring their own healthy ethical intuitions and vocabulary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16319242      PMCID: PMC1734063          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2005.011908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  3 in total

1.  The virtues (and vices) of the four principles.

Authors:  A V Campbell
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  In praise of unprincipled ethics.

Authors:  J Harris
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Ethics needs principles--four can encompass the rest--and respect for autonomy should be "first among equals".

Authors:  R Gillon
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.903

  3 in total
  10 in total

1.  Reasoned and reasonable approaches to ethics in undergraduate medical courses.

Authors:  A G Sutton
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Teaching to the converted: religious belief in the seminar room.

Authors:  I Brassington
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  William Osler and the jubjub of ethics; or how to teach medical ethics in the 21st century.

Authors:  Daniel K Sokol
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Medical students' perceptions of their ethics teaching.

Authors:  Carolyn Johnston; Peter Haughton
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Teaching ethics in Europe.

Authors:  Frédérique Claudot; François Alla; Xavier Ducrocq; Henry Coudane
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 6.  Ethical issues in anesthesia: the need for a more practical and contextual approach in teaching.

Authors:  Seetharaman Hariharan
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Knowledge, attitudes and practice of healthcare ethics and law among doctors and nurses in Barbados.

Authors:  Seetharaman Hariharan; Ramesh Jonnalagadda; Errol Walrond; Harley Moseley
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Psychiatry during the Nazi era: ethical lessons for the modern professional.

Authors:  Rael D Strous
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Engaging Tomorrow's Doctors in Clinical Ethics: Implications for Healthcare Organisations.

Authors:  Laura L Machin; Robin D Proctor
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2021-12

10.  Modeling Lay People's Ethical Attitudes to Organ Donation: A Q-Methodology Study.

Authors:  Muhammad M Hammami; Muhammad B Hammami; Reem Aboushaar
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.711

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.