AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine long-term survival after in-hospital cardiac arrests and to explore if and when the excess mortality risk imposed by the index event reaches that of an age and sex matched general population. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of data from 1,571 in-hospital cardiac arrests between the calendar years 1997 and 2002 inclusive was performed. Two hundred and fifty-nine people survived until hospital discharge, 220 of which were residents in England and included in the study. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed for the survivors and an age and sex matched comparator population, and survival compared with a one-sample log rank test. Smoothed hazard curves were constructed for the two populations. Differences in outcome from year of index event were also sought. RESULTS: 16.5% of patients survived to hospital discharge. Patients continue to experience a mortality rate greater than that of the comparator population during the first 200 days, with overall 70 deaths versus 18.7 as predicted from life tables (p < 0.0001). The hazard is greatest after resuscitation and falls thereafter until about 2 years where it is not very different to that of the comparator population and then subsequently rises. No evidence was found of a difference in the first year survival between patients resuscitated in different calendar years (p > 0.3 for all tests). CONCLUSION: The residual risk to an individual cardiac arrest survivor's life is greatest during the first year of survival, but declines progressively during the first 2 years after the event, subsequently approaching the risk experienced by the general population.
AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine long-term survival after in-hospital cardiac arrests and to explore if and when the excess mortality risk imposed by the index event reaches that of an age and sex matched general population. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of data from 1,571 in-hospital cardiac arrests between the calendar years 1997 and 2002 inclusive was performed. Two hundred and fifty-nine people survived until hospital discharge, 220 of which were residents in England and included in the study. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed for the survivors and an age and sex matched comparator population, and survival compared with a one-sample log rank test. Smoothed hazard curves were constructed for the two populations. Differences in outcome from year of index event were also sought. RESULTS: 16.5% of patients survived to hospital discharge. Patients continue to experience a mortality rate greater than that of the comparator population during the first 200 days, with overall 70 deaths versus 18.7 as predicted from life tables (p < 0.0001). The hazard is greatest after resuscitation and falls thereafter until about 2 years where it is not very different to that of the comparator population and then subsequently rises. No evidence was found of a difference in the first year survival between patients resuscitated in different calendar years (p > 0.3 for all tests). CONCLUSION: The residual risk to an individual cardiac arrest survivor's life is greatest during the first year of survival, but declines progressively during the first 2 years after the event, subsequently approaching the risk experienced by the general population.
Authors: Paul S Chan; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Harlan M Krumholz; John A Spertus; Yan Li; Bradley G Hammill; Lesley H Curtis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul Feingold; Michael J Mina; Rachel M Burke; Barry Hashimoto; Sara Gregg; Greg S Martin; Kenneth Leeper; Timothy Buchman Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Cindy H Hsu; Jiaqi Li; Marisa J Cinousis; Kelsey R Sheak; David F Gaieski; Benjamin S Abella; Marion Leary Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Jürgen Graf; Cecile Mühlhoff; Gordon S Doig; Sebastian Reinartz; Kirsten Bode; Robert Dujardin; Karl-Christian Koch; Elke Roeb; Uwe Janssens Journal: Crit Care Date: 2008-07-18 Impact factor: 9.097