OBJECTIVE: Despite recent advancements in post-cardiac arrest resuscitation, the optimal measurement of postarrest outcome remains unclear. We hypothesized that Cerebral Performance Category score can predict the long-term outcome of postarrest survivors who received targeted temperature management during their postarrest hospital care. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Two academic medical centers from May 2005 to December 2012. PATIENTS: The medical records of 2,417 out-of-hospital and in-hospital patients post cardiac arrest were reviewed to identify 140 of 582 survivors who received targeted temperature management. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The Cerebral Performance Category scores at hospital discharge were determined by three independent abstractors. The 1-month, 6-month, and 12-month survival of these patients was determined by reviewing hospital records and querying the Social Security Death Index and by follow-up telephone calls. The association of unadjusted long-term survival and adjusted survival with Cerebral Performance Category was calculated. Of the 2,417 patients who were identified to have undergone cardiac arrest, 24.1% (582/2,417) were successfully resuscitated, of whom 24.1% (140/582) received postarrest targeted temperature management. Overall, 42.9% of patients (60/140) were discharged with Cerebral Performance Category 1, 27.1% (38/140) with Cerebral Performance Category 2, 18.6% (26/140) with Cerebral Performance Category 3, and 11.4% (16/140) with Cerebral Performance Category 4. Cerebral Performance Category 1 survivors had the highest long-term survival followed by Cerebral Performance Categories 2 and 3, with Cerebral Performance Category 4 having the lowest long-term survival (p < 0.001, log-rank test). We found that Cerebral Performance Category 3 (hazard ratio = 3.62, p < 0.05) and Cerebral Performance Category 4 (hazard ratio = 12.73, p < 0.001) remained associated with worse survival after adjusting for age, gender, race, shockable rhythm, time to targeted temperature management initiation, total duration of resuscitation, withdrawal of care, and location of arrest. CONCLUSION: Patients with different Cerebral Performance Category scores at discharge have significantly different survival trajectories. Favorable Cerebral Performance Category at hospital discharge predicts better long-term outcomes of survivors of cardiac arrest who received targeted temperature management than those with less favorable Cerebral Performance Category scores.
OBJECTIVE: Despite recent advancements in post-cardiac arrest resuscitation, the optimal measurement of postarrest outcome remains unclear. We hypothesized that Cerebral Performance Category score can predict the long-term outcome of postarrest survivors who received targeted temperature management during their postarrest hospital care. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Two academic medical centers from May 2005 to December 2012. PATIENTS: The medical records of 2,417 out-of-hospital and in-hospital patients post cardiac arrest were reviewed to identify 140 of 582 survivors who received targeted temperature management. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The Cerebral Performance Category scores at hospital discharge were determined by three independent abstractors. The 1-month, 6-month, and 12-month survival of these patients was determined by reviewing hospital records and querying the Social Security Death Index and by follow-up telephone calls. The association of unadjusted long-term survival and adjusted survival with Cerebral Performance Category was calculated. Of the 2,417 patients who were identified to have undergone cardiac arrest, 24.1% (582/2,417) were successfully resuscitated, of whom 24.1% (140/582) received postarrest targeted temperature management. Overall, 42.9% of patients (60/140) were discharged with Cerebral Performance Category 1, 27.1% (38/140) with Cerebral Performance Category 2, 18.6% (26/140) with Cerebral Performance Category 3, and 11.4% (16/140) with Cerebral Performance Category 4. Cerebral Performance Category 1 survivors had the highest long-term survival followed by Cerebral Performance Categories 2 and 3, with Cerebral Performance Category 4 having the lowest long-term survival (p < 0.001, log-rank test). We found that Cerebral Performance Category 3 (hazard ratio = 3.62, p < 0.05) and Cerebral Performance Category 4 (hazard ratio = 12.73, p < 0.001) remained associated with worse survival after adjusting for age, gender, race, shockable rhythm, time to targeted temperature management initiation, total duration of resuscitation, withdrawal of care, and location of arrest. CONCLUSION:Patients with different Cerebral Performance Category scores at discharge have significantly different survival trajectories. Favorable Cerebral Performance Category at hospital discharge predicts better long-term outcomes of survivors of cardiac arrest who received targeted temperature management than those with less favorable Cerebral Performance Category scores.
Authors: R O Cummins; D A Chamberlain; N S Abramson; M Allen; P J Baskett; L Becker; L Bossaert; H H Delooz; W F Dick; M S Eisenberg Journal: Circulation Date: 1991-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mary Ann Peberdy; William Kaye; Joseph P Ornato; Gregory L Larkin; Vinay Nadkarni; Mary Elizabeth Mancini; Robert A Berg; Graham Nichol; Tanya Lane-Trultt Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Sachin Agarwal; Alex Presciutti; William Roth; Elizabeth Matthews; Ashley Rodriguez; David J Roh; Soojin Park; Jan Claassen; Ronald M Lazar Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Claire S Jacobs; Louis Beers; Suna Park; Benjamin Scirica; Galen V Henderson; Liangge Hsu; Matthew Bevers; Barbara A Dworetzky; Jong Woo Lee Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Cindy H Hsu; Bryce E Haac; Mack Drake; Andrew C Bernard; Alberto Aiolfi; Kenji Inaba; Holly E Hinson; Chinar Agarwal; Joseph Galante; Emily M Tibbits; Nicholas J Johnson; David Carlbom; Mina F Mirhoseini; Mayur B Patel; Karen R OʼBosky; Christian Chan; Pascal O Udekwu; Megan Farrell; Jeffrey L Wild; Katelyn A Young; Daniel C Cullinane; Deborah J Gojmerac; Alexandra Weissman; Clifton Callaway; Sarah M Perman; Mariana Guerrero; Imoigele P Aisiku; Raghu R Seethala; Ivan N Co; Debbie Y Madhok; Bryan Darger; Dennis Y Kim; Lara Spence; Thomas M Scalea; Deborah M Stein Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Anne V Grossestreuer; Benjamin S Abella; Kelsey R Sheak; Marisa J Cinousis; Sarah M Perman; Marion Leary; Douglas J Wiebe; David F Gaieski Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2016-09-17 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Michael A Ferguson; Robert M Sutton; Michael Karlsson; Fredrik Sjövall; Lance B Becker; Robert A Berg; Susan S Margulies; Todd J Kilbaugh Journal: J Bioenerg Biomembr Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 2.945