Literature DB >> 16317179

Genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: responsibility and choice.

Lori d'Agincourt-Canning1.   

Abstract

Genetic testing for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer has become an important part of clinical genetics practice. Although considerable work has focused on the psychological impact of this technology, there has been little research into the moral implications of genetic information on hereditary cancer families. In this article, the author examines moral issues related to individuals' decisions to seek or decline testing. In-depth interviews with 53 participants make up the core of the research. Analysis of participants' accounts illustrates how the decision to be tested (or not) interconnects with moral agency and aspects of self (embodied, familial-relational, and civic self). The findings form the foundation for inquiry into conceptualization of moral responsibility, autonomy, and choice. They also provide insight that might assist clinicians to understand more fully the needs and responses of those who seek genetic testing for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16317179     DOI: 10.1177/1049732305284002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  23 in total

1.  Comparing family members' motivations and attitudes towards genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Caroline Dancyger; Jonathan A Smith; Chris Jacobs; Melissa Wallace; Susan Michie
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Decision-making about inherited cancer risk: exploring dimensions of genetic responsibility.

Authors:  Holly Etchegary; Fiona Miller; Sonya deLaat; Brenda Wilson; June Carroll; Mario Cappelli
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  "It was an Emotional Baby": Previvors' Family Planning Decision-Making Styles about Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Marleah Dean; Emily A Rauscher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Psychometric testing of the decisional conflict scale: genetic testing hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Maria C Katapodi; Michelle L Munro; Penny F Pierce; Reg A Williams
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Preserving the self: the process of decision making about hereditary breast cancer and ovarian cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  A Fuchsia Howard; Lynda G Balneaves; Joan L Bottorff; Patricia Rodney
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-10-27

6.  Facilitators and Challenges in Psychosocial Adaptation to Being at Increased Familial Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Louise Heiniger; Melanie A Price; Margaret Charles; Phyllis N Butow
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  A Relational Approach to Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Rowan Forbes Shepherd; Tamara Kayali Browne; Linda Warwick
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Psychosocial consequences of false-positive newborn screens for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Audrey Tluczek; Kate Murphy Orland; Laura Cavanagh
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-09-17

9.  Impact of Genetic Counseling and Testing on Altruistic Motivations to Test for BRCA1/2: a Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Rahul Garg; Joseph Vogelgesang; Kimberly Kelly
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  The impact of social contexts in testing for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: the roles of physicians and others.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.