Literature DB >> 26303026

Updating representations of temporal intervals.

James Danckert1, Britt Anderson2.   

Abstract

Effectively engaging with the world depends on accurate representations of the regularities that make up that world-what we call mental models. The success of any mental model depends on the ability to adapt to changes-to 'update' the model. In prior work, we have shown that damage to the right hemisphere of the brain impairs the ability to update mental models across a range of tasks. Given the disparate nature of the tasks we have employed in this prior work (i.e. statistical learning, language acquisition, position priming, perceptual ambiguity, strategic game play), we propose that a cognitive module important for updating mental representations should be generic, in the sense that it is invoked across multiple cognitive and perceptual domains. To date, the majority of our tasks have been visual in nature. Given the ubiquity and import of temporal information in sensory experience, we examined the ability to build and update mental models of time. We had healthy individuals complete a temporal prediction task in which intervals were initially drawn from one temporal range before an unannounced switch to a different range of intervals. Separate groups had the second range of intervals switch to one that contained either longer or shorter intervals than the first range. Both groups showed significant positive correlations between perceptual and prediction accuracy. While each group updated mental models of temporal intervals, those exposed to shorter intervals did so more efficiently. Our results support the notion of generic capacity to update regularities in the environment-in this instance based on temporal information. The task developed here is well suited to investigations in neurological patients and in neuroimaging settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mental models; Prediction; Temporal perception; Updating

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26303026     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4422-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  44 in total

Review 1.  Motor learning and prediction in a variable environment.

Authors:  Paul R Davidson; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Neglected time: impaired temporal perception of multisecond intervals in unilateral neglect.

Authors:  James Danckert; Susanne Ferber; Carson Pun; Carol Broderick; Christopher Striemer; Sherry Rock; Dwight Stewart
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Seeing slow and seeing fast: two limits on perception.

Authors:  Alex O Holcombe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 4.  How to grow a mind: statistics, structure, and abstraction.

Authors:  Joshua B Tenenbaum; Charles Kemp; Thomas L Griffiths; Noah D Goodman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Anatomy of motor learning. I. Frontal cortex and attention to action.

Authors:  M Jueptner; K M Stephan; C D Frith; D J Brooks; R S Frackowiak; R E Passingham
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness.

Authors:  D M Beck; G Rees; C D Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Encoding of temporal probabilities in the human brain.

Authors:  Domenica Bueti; Bahador Bahrami; Vincent Walsh; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  An ERP study of change detection, change blindness, and visual awareness.

Authors:  Mika Koivisto; Antti Revonsuo
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Deciphering the impact of cerebellar and basal ganglia dysfunction in accuracy and variability of motor timing.

Authors:  Daniel O Claassen; Catherine R G Jones; Minhong Yu; Georg Dirnberger; Tim Malone; Michael Parkinson; Paola Giunti; Michael Kubovy; Marjan Jahanshahi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Attentional Enhancement of Auditory Mismatch Responses: a DCM/MEG Study.

Authors:  Ryszard Auksztulewicz; Karl Friston
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  1 in total

1.  Statistical Learning Impairments as a Consequence of Stroke.

Authors:  Albulena Shaqiri; James Danckert; Lauren Burnett; Britt Anderson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.169

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.