Literature DB >> 34089142

Reward impacts visual statistical learning.

Su Hyoun Park1, Leeland L Rogers2, Matthew R Johnson3, Timothy J Vickery2.   

Abstract

Humans automatically detect and remember regularities in the visual environment-a type of learning termed visual statistical learning (VSL). Many aspects of learning from reward resemble VSL in certain respects, yet whether and how reward learning impacts VSL is largely unexamined. In two studies, we found that reward contingencies affect VSL, with high-value associated with stronger behavioral and neural signatures of such learning than low-value images. In Experiment 1, participants learned values (high or low) of images through a trial-and-error risky choice task. Unbeknownst to them, images were paired as four types-High-High, High-Low, Low-High, and Low-Low. In subsequent recognition and reward memory tests, participants chose the more familiar of two pairs (a target and a foil) and recalled the value of images. We found better recognition when the first images of pairs have high-values, with High-High pairs showing the highest recognition rate. In Experiment 2, we provided evidence that both value and statistical contingencies affected brain responses. When we compared responses between the high-value first image and the low-value first image, greater activation in regions that included inferior frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate gyrus, hippocampus, among other regions, were found. These findings were driven by the interaction between statistically structured information and reward-the same value contrast yielded no regions for second-image contrasts and for singletons. Our results suggest that when reward information is embedded in stimulus-stimulus associations, it may alter the learning process; specifically, the higher-value first image potentially enables better memory for statistically learned pairs and reward information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Memory; Reward; Reward motivation; Visual statistical learning; fMRI

Year:  2021        PMID: 34089142     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-021-00920-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  13 in total

1.  Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes.

Authors:  J Fiser; R N Aslin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

Review 2.  The computational neurobiology of learning and reward.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Daw; Kenji Doya
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

4.  Reward grabs the eye: oculomotor capture by rewarding stimuli.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes; Artem V Belopolsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences.

Authors:  József Fiser; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Parceling human accumbens into putative core and shell dissociates encoding of values for reward and pain.

Authors:  Marwan N Baliki; Ali Mansour; Alex T Baria; Lejian Huang; Sara E Berger; Howard L Fields; A Vania Apkarian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Human midbrain sensitivity to cognitive feedback and uncertainty during classification learning.

Authors:  A R Aron; D Shohamy; J Clark; C Myers; M A Gluck; R A Poldrack
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  The functional neuroanatomy of the human orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology.

Authors:  Morten L Kringelbach; Edmund T Rolls
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 11.685

9.  Reward predictions bias attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Patryk A Laurent; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Reward processing in the value-driven attention network: reward signals tracking cue identity and location.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.436

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reward and loss incentives improve spatial working memory by shaping trial-by-trial posterior frontoparietal signals.

Authors:  Youngsun T Cho; Flora Moujaes; Charles H Schleifer; Martina Starc; Jie Lisa Ji; Nicole Santamauro; Brendan Adkinson; Antonija Kolobaric; Morgan Flynn; John H Krystal; John D Murray; Grega Repovs; Alan Anticevic
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 7.400

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.