Literature DB >> 16314503

Mutations of the Yku80 C terminus and Xrs2 FHA domain specifically block yeast nonhomologous end joining.

Phillip L Palmbos1, James M Daley, Thomas E Wilson.   

Abstract

The nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway of DNA double-strand break repair requires three protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: MRX (Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2), Ku (Ku70-Ku80), and DNA ligase IV (Dnl4-Lif1-Nej1). Much is known about the interactions that mediate the formation of each complex, but little is known about how they act together during repair. A comprehensive yeast two-hybrid screen of the NHEJ factors of S. cerevisiae revealed all known interactions within the MRX, Ku, and DNA ligase IV complexes, as well as three additional, weaker interactions between Yku80-Dnl4, Xrs2-Lif1, and Mre11-Yku80. Individual and combined deletions of the Yku80 C terminus and the Xrs2 forkhead-associated (FHA) domain were designed based on the latter two-hybrid results. These deletions synergistically blocked NHEJ but not the telomere and recombination functions of Ku and MRX, confirming that these protein regions are functionally important specifically for NHEJ. Further mutational analysis of Yku80 identified a putative C-terminal amphipathic alpha-helix that is both required for its NHEJ function and strikingly similar to a DNA-dependent protein kinase interaction motif in human Ku80. These results identify a novel role in yeast NHEJ for the poorly characterized Ku80 C-terminal and Xrs2 FHA domains, and they suggest that redundant binding of DNA ligase IV facilitates completion of this DNA repair event.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16314503      PMCID: PMC1316971          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.25.24.10782-10790.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  44 in total

1.  Mycobacterial Ku and ligase proteins constitute a two-component NHEJ repair machine.

Authors:  Marina Della; Phillip L Palmbos; Hui-Min Tseng; Louise M Tonkin; James M Daley; Leana M Topper; Robert S Pitcher; Alan E Tomkinson; Thomas E Wilson; Aidan J Doherty
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications.

Authors:  C B Brachmann; A Davies; G J Cost; E Caputo; J Li; P Hieter; J D Boeke
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1998-01-30       Impact factor: 3.239

3.  Yeast DNA ligase IV mediates non-homologous DNA end joining.

Authors:  T E Wilson; U Grawunder; M R Lieber
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-07-31       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Mapping of protein-protein interactions within the DNA-dependent protein kinase complex.

Authors:  D Gell; S P Jackson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis.

Authors:  E A Winzeler; D D Shoemaker; A Astromoff; H Liang; K Anderson; B Andre; R Bangham; R Benito; J D Boeke; H Bussey; A M Chu; C Connelly; K Davis; F Dietrich; S W Dow; M El Bakkoury; F Foury; S H Friend; E Gentalen; G Giaever; J H Hegemann; T Jones; M Laub; H Liao; N Liebundguth; D J Lockhart; A Lucau-Danila; M Lussier; N M'Rabet; P Menard; M Mittmann; C Pai; C Rebischung; J L Revuelta; L Riles; C J Roberts; P Ross-MacDonald; B Scherens; M Snyder; S Sookhai-Mahadeo; R K Storms; S Véronneau; M Voet; G Volckaert; T R Ward; R Wysocki; G S Yen; K Yu; K Zimmermann; P Philippsen; M Johnston; R W Davis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-08-06       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Efficient processing of DNA ends during yeast nonhomologous end joining. Evidence for a DNA polymerase beta (Pol4)-dependent pathway.

Authors:  T E Wilson; M R Lieber
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-08-13       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Components of the Ku-dependent non-homologous end-joining pathway are involved in telomeric length maintenance and telomeric silencing.

Authors:  S J Boulton; S P Jackson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-03-16       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Separation of silencing from perinuclear anchoring functions in yeast Ku80, Sir4 and Esc1 proteins.

Authors:  Angela Taddei; Florence Hediger; Frank R Neumann; Christoph Bauer; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Telomere maintenance is dependent on activities required for end repair of double-strand breaks.

Authors:  C I Nugent; G Bosco; L O Ross; S K Evans; A P Salinger; J K Moore; J E Haber; V Lundblad
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-05-21       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  The yeast Ku heterodimer is essential for protection of the telomere against nucleolytic and recombinational activities.

Authors:  R M Polotnianka; J Li; A J Lustig
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-07-02       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  41 in total

1.  In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, yKu and subtelomeric core X sequences repress homologous recombination near telomeres as part of the same pathway.

Authors:  Marcus E Marvin; Craig D Griffin; David E Eyre; David B H Barton; Edward J Louis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Eukaryotic DNA ligases: structural and functional insights.

Authors:  Tom Ellenberger; Alan E Tomkinson
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 3.  MRN and the race to the break.

Authors:  Agnieszka Rupnik; Noel F Lowndes; Muriel Grenon
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  RSC facilitates Rad59-dependent homologous recombination between sister chromatids by promoting cohesin loading at DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Oum; Changhyun Seong; Youngho Kwon; Jae-Hoon Ji; Amy Sid; Sreejith Ramakrishnan; Grzegorz Ira; Anna Malkova; Patrick Sung; Sang Eun Lee; Eun Yong Shim
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Regulation of Ku-DNA association by Yku70 C-terminal tail and SUMO modification.

Authors:  Lisa E Hang; Christopher R Lopez; Xianpeng Liu; Jaime M Williams; Inn Chung; Lei Wei; Alison A Bertuch; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Repair of double-strand breaks by end joining.

Authors:  Kishore K Chiruvella; Zhuobin Liang; Thomas E Wilson
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 7.  Consider the workhorse: Nonhomologous end-joining in budding yeast.

Authors:  Charlene H Emerson; Alison A Bertuch
Journal:  Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.626

Review 8.  Nonhomologous end joining: a good solution for bad ends.

Authors:  Crystal A Waters; Natasha T Strande; David W Wyatt; John M Pryor; Dale A Ramsden
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-03-14

9.  Forkhead-associated domain of yeast Xrs2, a homolog of human Nbs1, promotes nonhomologous end joining through interaction with a ligase IV partner protein, Lif1.

Authors:  Kenichiro Matsuzaki; Akira Shinohara; Miki Shinohara
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  A novel function for the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex in base excision repair.

Authors:  Sylvia Steininger; Fred Ahne; Klaudia Winkler; Anja Kleinschmidt; Friederike Eckardt-Schupp; Simone Moertl
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.