Literature DB >> 16311819

Methodological scheme for designing the monitoring of genetically modified crops at the regional scale.

F Graef1, W Züghart, B Hommel, U Heinrich, U Stachow, A Werner.   

Abstract

According to EC regulations the deliberate release of genetically modified (GM) crops into the agro-environment needs to be accompanied by environmental monitoring to detect potential adverse effects, e.g. unacceptable levels of gene flow from GM to non-GM crops, or adverse effects on single species or species groups thus reducing biodiversity. There is, however, considerable scientific and public debate on how GM crops should be monitored with sufficient accuracy, discussing questions of potential adverse effects, agro-environmental variables or indicators to be monitored and respective detection methods; Another basic component, the appropriate number and location of monitoring sites, is hardly considered. Currently, no consistent GM crop monitoring approach combines these components systematically. This study focuses on and integrates spatial agro-environmental aspects at a landscape level in order to design monitoring networks. Based on examples of environmental variables associated with the cropping of Bt-Maize (Zea maize L.), herbicide-tolerant (HT) winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.), HT sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), and starch-modified potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), we develop a transferable framework and assessment scheme that comprises anticipated adverse environmental effects, variables to be measured and monitoring methods. These we integrate with a rule-based GIS (geographic information system) analysis, applying widely available spatial area and point information from existing environmental networks. This is used to develop scenarios with optimised regional GM crop monitoring networks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16311819     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-005-8044-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  12 in total

1.  Insecticidal toxin in root exudates from Bt corn.

Authors:  D Saxena; S Flores; G Stotzky
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-12-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants.

Authors:  L L Wolfenbarger; P R Phifer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Assessing the risks associated with new agricultural practices.

Authors:  R S Hails
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-08-08       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Consequences of gene flow.

Authors:  Allison A Snow
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar

5.  Why regulate and how?

Authors:  Julian Kinderlerer
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar

Review 6.  Databases on biotechnology and biosafety of GMOs.

Authors:  Giuliano Degrassi; Nevena Alexandrova; Decio Ripandelli
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep

7.  Selection of relevant non-target herbivores for monitoring the environmental effects of Bt maize pollen.

Authors:  Gregor Schmitz; Detlef Bartsch; Peter Pretscher
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun

8.  Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: a risk assessment.

Authors:  M K Sears; R L Hellmich; D E Stanley-Horn; K S Oberhauser; J M Pleasants; H R Mattila; B D Siegfried; G P Dively
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Corn pollen deposition on milkweeds in and near cornfields.

Authors:  J M Pleasants; R L Hellmich; G P Dively; M K Sears; D E Stanley-Horn; H R Mattila; J E Foster; P Clark; G D Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Pollen-mediated movement of herbicide resistance between commercial canola fields.

Authors:  Mary A Rieger; Michael Lamond; Christopher Preston; Stephen B Powles; Richard T Roush
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  8 in total

1.  Information system for monitoring environmental impacts of genetically modified organisms.

Authors:  Hauke Reuter; Ulrike Middelhoff; Frieder Graef; Richard Verhoeven; Thomas Batz; Martin Weis; Gunther Schmidt; Winfried Schröder; Broder Breckling
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Heterogeneity in the distribution of genetically modified and conventional oilseed rape within fields and seed lots.

Authors:  Graham S Begg; Martin J Elliott; Danny W Cullen; Pietro P M Iannetta; Geoff R Squire
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Quantifying the introgressive hybridisation propensity between transgenic oilseed rape and its wild/weedy relatives.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Adinda De Schrijver; Dirk Reheul
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Are Adult Crambid Snout Moths (Crambinae) and Larval Stages of Lepidoptera Suitable Tools for an Environmental Monitoring of Transgenic Crops? - Implications of a Field Test.

Authors:  Andreas Lang; Matthias Dolek; Bernhard Theißen; Andreas Zapp
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.769

5.  The cultivation of Bt corn producing Cry1Ac toxins does not adversely affect non-target arthropods.

Authors:  Yanyan Guo; Yanjie Feng; Yang Ge; Guillaume Tetreau; Xiaowen Chen; Xuehui Dong; Wangpeng Shi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A 2-year field study shows little evidence that the long-term planting of transgenic insect-resistant cotton affects the community structure of soil nematodes.

Authors:  Xiaogang Li; Biao Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Impact of transgenic wheat with wheat yellow mosaic virus resistance on microbial community diversity and enzyme activity in rhizosphere soil.

Authors:  Jirong Wu; Mingzheng Yu; Jianhong Xu; Juan Du; Fang Ji; Fei Dong; Xinhai Li; Jianrong Shi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Three-Year Plant Study of Salt-Tolerant Transgenic Maize Showed No Effects on Soil Enzyme Activity and Nematode Community.

Authors:  Xing Zeng; Tongtong Pei; Yongfeng Song; Pei Guo; Huilan Zhang; Xin Li; Hao Li; Hong Di; Zhenhua Wang
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.