Literature DB >> 18253849

Quantifying the introgressive hybridisation propensity between transgenic oilseed rape and its wild/weedy relatives.

Yann Devos1, Adinda De Schrijver, Dirk Reheul.   

Abstract

In order to estimate the introgressive hybridisation propensity (IHP) between genetically modified (GM) oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and certain of its cross-compatible wild/weedy relatives at the landscape level, a conceptual approach was developed. A gene flow index was established enclosing the successive steps to successfully achieve introgressive hybridisation: wild/weedy relatives and oilseed rape should co-occur, have overlapping flowering periods, be compatible, produce viable and fertile progeny, and the transgenes should persist in natural/weedy populations. Each step was described and scored, resulting in an IHP value for each cross-compatible oilseed rape wild/weedy relative. The gene flow index revealed that Brassica rapa has the highest introgressive hybridisation propensity (IHP value = 11.5), followed by Hirschfeldia incana and Raphanus raphanistrum (IHP = 6.7), Brassica juncea (IHP = 5.1), Diplotaxis tenuifolia and Sinapis arvensis (IHP = 4.5) in Flanders. Based on the IHP values, monitoring priorities can be defined within the pool of cross-compatible wild/weedy oilseed rape relatives. Moreover, the developed approach enables to select areas where case-specific monitoring of GM oilseed rape could be done in order to detect potential adverse effects on cross-compatible wild/weedy relatives resulting from vertical gene flow. The implementation of the proposed oilseed rape-wild relative gene flow index revealed that the survey design of existing botanical survey networks does not suit general surveillance needs of GM crops in Belgium. The encountered hurdles to implement the gene flow index and proposals to acquire the missing data are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18253849     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-008-0204-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  42 in total

1.  Employing a composite gene-flow index to numerically quantify a crop's potential for gene flow: an Irish perspective.

Authors:  Marie-Louise Flannery; Conor Meade; Ewen Mullins
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar

2.  A conceptual framework for the design of environmental post-market monitoring of genetically modified plants.

Authors:  Olivier Sanvido; Franco Widmer; Michael Winzeler; Franz Bigler
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar

3.  Why most conservation monitoring is, but need not be, a waste of time.

Authors:  Colin J Legg; Laszlo Nagy
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2005-08-19       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Assembling spatially explicit landscape models of pollen and spore dispersal by wind for risk assessment.

Authors:  M W Shaw; T D Harwood; M J Wilkinson; L Elliott
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Genes invading new populations: a risk assessment perspective.

Authors:  Rosie S Hails; Kate Morley
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Low probability of chloroplast movement from oilseed rape (Brassica napus) into wild Brassica rapa.

Authors:  S E Scott; M J Wilkinson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Preferential exclusion of hybrids in mixed pollinations between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy B. campestris (Brassicaceae).

Authors:  T Hauser; R Jorgensen; H Ostergard
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.844

8.  A direct regional scale estimate of transgene movement from genetically modified oilseed rape to its wild progenitors.

Authors:  M J Wilkinson; I J Davenport; Y M Charters; A E Jones; J Allainguillaume; H T Butler; D C Mason; A F Raybould
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Barriers to gene flow from oilseed rape (Brassica napus) into populations of Sinapis arvensis.

Authors:  C L Moyes; J M Lilley; C A Casais; S G Cole; P D Haeger; P J Dale
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Hybridization between transgenic Brassica napus L. and its wild relatives: Brassica rapa L., Raphanus raphanistrum L., Sinapis arvensis L., and Erucastrum gallicum (Willd.) O.E. Schulz.

Authors:  S I Warwick; M-J Simard; A Légère; H J Beckie; L Braun; B Zhu; P Mason; G Séguin-Swartz; C N Stewart
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 5.699

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Feral genetically modified herbicide tolerant oilseed rape from seed import spills: are concerns scientifically justified?

Authors:  Yann Devos; Rosemary S Hails; Antoine Messéan; Joe N Perry; Geoffrey R Squire
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Potential for gene flow from genetically modified Brassica napus on the territory of Russia.

Authors:  Elena V Mikhaylova; Bulat R Kuluev
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape 73496 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2012-109).

Authors:  Hanspeter Naegeli; Jean-Louis Bresson; Tamas Dalmay; Ian Crawford Dewhurst; Michelle M Epstein; Leslie George Firbank; Philippe Guerche; Jan Hejatko; Francisco Javier Moreno; Ewen Mullins; Fabien Nogué; Nils Rostoks; Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano; Giovanni Savoini; Eve Veromann; Fabio Veronesi; Michele Ardizzone; Yann Devos; Silvia Federici; Antonio Fernandez Dumont; Andrea Gennaro; Jose Ángel Gómez Ruiz; Franco Maria Neri; Nikoletta Papadopoulou; Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos; Anna Lanzoni
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-06-17

4.  IMI resistance associated to crop-weed hybridization in a natural Brassica rapa population: characterization and fate.

Authors:  M S Ureta; F Torres Carbonell; C Pandolfo; A D Presotto; M A Cantamutto; M Poverene
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Seed bank dynamics govern persistence of Brassica hybrids in crop and natural habitats.

Authors:  Danny A P Hooftman; James M Bullock; Kathryn Morley; Caroline Lamb; David J Hodgson; Philippa Bell; Jane Thomas; Rosemary S Hails
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MON 94100 for food and feed uses, under regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2020-169).

Authors:  Ewen Mullins; Jean-Louis Bresson; Tamas Dalmay; Ian Crawford Dewhurst; Michelle M Epstein; Leslie George Firbank; Philippe Guerche; Jan Hejatko; Francisco Javier Moreno; Hanspeter Naegeli; Fabien Nogué; Nils Rostoks; Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano; Giovanni Savoini; Eve Veromann; Fabio Veronesi; Michele Ardizzone; Giacomo De Sanctis; Silvia Federici; Antonio Fernandez Dumont; Andrea Gennaro; Jose Angel Gomez Ruiz; Tilemachos Goumperis; Anna Lanzoni; Paolo Lenzi; Franco Maria Neri; Nikoletta Papadopoulou; Tommaso Raffaello; Franz Streissl
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-07-22

7.  Genetic load and transgenic mitigating genes in transgenic Brassica rapa (field mustard) x Brassica napus (oilseed rape) hybrid populations.

Authors:  Christy W Rose; Reginald J Millwood; Hong S Moon; Murali R Rao; Matthew D Halfhill; Paul L Raymer; Suzanne I Warwick; Hani Al-Ahmad; Jonathan Gressel; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 2.563

Review 8.  A Review of the Unintentional Release of Feral Genetically Modified Rapeseed into the Environment.

Authors:  Soo-In Sohn; Subramani Pandian; Young-Ju Oh; Hyeon-Jung Kang; Tae-Hun Ryu; Woo-Suk Cho; Eun-Kyoung Shin; Kong-Sik Shin
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.