Literature DB >> 16311421

Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and conventional radiography for the detection of vertebral fractures.

Lialia Pavlov1, Gregory D Gamble, Ian R Reid.   

Abstract

Prevalent vertebral fractures confer a high risk of subsequent fractures; therefore, fracture identification is a key issue in osteoporosis management. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry has become the most widespread technique for the assessment of bone density, and can also provide images for assessment of vertebral morphometry (MXA) that are undistorted by parallax. The radiation dose is very low compared with conventional radiography. Whether the resolution of MXA is adequate for vertebral morphometry is uncertain. The present study compares MXA with conventional radiography in detecting vertebral deformities. MXA scans and lateral radiographs were performed in 61 women with osteoporosis. Adequate images were obtained in 99.1% of the 793 vertebrae by radiography and 95.6% by MXA. Poor image quality was mostly at T4-6 by MXA. Precision of repeat analyses was comparable between the techniques. Heights measured by MXA were 24 to 35% less than the radiographic values, the methods produced equivalent results for the ratio of anterior to posterior heights, but the MXA values for middle to posterior ratios were about 10% lower than for the radiographs (p < 0.0001). The extent of agreement between the techniques in identifying vertebral fractures was dependent on the strictness of the fracture definition used. With a 3 standard deviation (SD) criterion, the techniques found similar numbers of patients to have vertebral deformities, and the concordance in classification of individual vertebrae was 94%. At a 2 SD, cut-off concordance was 79%, and at 4 SD, it was 96%. Receiver-operating characteristic curves using cut-offs of > or = 3 SDs also showed excellent diagnostic accuracy. We conclude that MXA shows acceptable performance for clinical use in diagnosing vertebral deformities, as long as cut-offs of > or = 3 SDs are used, although a few percent of vertebrae in the upper thoracic region cannot be imaged adequately using this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16311421     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:8:4:379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  8 in total

1.  New dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry equipment in the assessment of vertebral fractures: technical limits and software accuracy.

Authors:  Alberto Bazzocchi; Danila Diano; Giuseppe Battista; Ugo Albisinni; Cristina Rossi; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Combined vertebral fracture assessment and bone mineral density measurement: a patient-friendly new tool with an important impact on the Canadian Risk Fracture Classification.

Authors:  Pieter L Jager; Riemer H J A Slart; Colin L Webber; Jonathan D Adachi; Alexandra L Papaioannou; Karen Y Gulenchyn
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 2.248

3.  Vertebral morphometry by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for osteoporotic vertebral fractures assessment (VFA).

Authors:  D Diacinti; G Guglielmi; D Pisani; D Diacinti; R Argirò; C Serafini; E Romagnoli; S Minisola; C Catalano; V David
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Evaluation of vertebral fracture assessment by dual X-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter setting.

Authors:  T Fuerst; C Wu; H K Genant; G von Ingersleben; Y Chen; C Johnston; M J Econs; N Binkley; T J Vokes; G Crans; B H Mitlak
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Vertebral fracture assessment: impact of instrument and reader.

Authors:  B Buehring; D Krueger; M Checovich; D Gemar; N Vallarta-Ast; H K Genant; N Binkley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Vertebral fracture assessment: Current research status and application in patients with kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Efstathios Drampalos; Konstantinos Nikolopoulos; Christos Baltas; Alexia Balanika; Antonis Galanos; Nikolaos Papaioannou; Spyros Pneumaticos
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-10-18

7.  Combined vertebral fracture assessment and bone mineral density measurement: a new standard in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in academic populations.

Authors:  P L Jager; S Jonkman; W Koolhaas; A Stiekema; B H R Wolffenbuttel; R H J A Slart
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of DXA compared to conventional spine radiographs for the detection of vertebral fractures in children.

Authors:  E Adiotomre; L Summers; A Allison; S J Walters; M Digby; P Broadley; I Lang; G Morrison; N Bishop; P Arundel; A C Offiah
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.