Literature DB >> 16311287

Strategies and clinical outcome of 250 cycles of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for single gene disorders.

F Fiorentino1, A Biricik, A Nuccitelli, R De Palma, S Kahraman, M Iacobelli, V Trengia, D Caserta, M A Bonu, A Borini, M Baldi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We report on our experience with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for single gene disorders (SGDs), from 1999 to 2004, describing strategies and overall clinical outcome of 250 cycles in 174 couples for 23 different genetic conditions.
METHODS: PGD cycles included 15 for autosomal dominant, 148 for autosomal recessive and 19 for X-linked SGDs. In addition, 68 cycles of PGD for SGDs were performed in combination with HLA matching. The strategy in each case used an initial multiplex PCR, followed by minisequencing to identify the mutation(s) combined with multiplex PCR for closely linked informative markers to increase accuracy. Linkage analysis, using intragenic and/or extragenic polymorphic microsatellite markers, was performed in cases where the disease-causing mutation(s) was unknown or undetectable.
RESULTS: In 250 PGD cycles, a total of 1961 cleavage stage embryos were biopsied. PCR was successful in 3409 out of 3149 (92.4%) biopsied blastomeres and a diagnosis was possible in 1849 (94.3%) embryos. Four hundred and twenty-seven embryos were transferred in 211 cycles, resulting in 71 pregnancies (33.6% per embryo transfer), including 15 biochemical pregnancies, six spontaneous miscarriages, two ectopic pregnancies, which were terminated, and nine pregnancies which are still ongoing. The remaining pregnancies were confirmed to be unaffected and went to term without complications, resulting in the birth of 35 healthy babies.
CONCLUSIONS: Minisequencing for mutation detection combined with multiplex fluorescence PCR for linkage analysis is an efficient, accurate and widely applicable strategy for PGD of SGDs. Our experience provides a further demonstration that PGD is an effective clinical tool and a useful option for many couples with a high risk of transmitting a genetic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16311287     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  15 in total

1.  Quality management system in PGD/PGS: now is the time.

Authors:  Xavier Vendrell; Raquel Carrero; Trinitat Alberola; Rosa Bautista-Llácer; Elena García-Mengual; Reyes Claramunt; Manuel Pérez-Alonso
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Evaluation of PCR-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis applied to monogenic diseases: a collaborative ESHRE PGD consortium study.

Authors:  Jos Dreesen; Aspasia Destouni; Georgia Kourlaba; Birte Degn; Wulf Christensen Mette; Filipa Carvalho; Celine Moutou; Sioban Sengupta; Seema Dhanjal; Pamela Renwick; Steven Davies; Emmanouel Kanavakis; Gary Harton; Joanne Traeger-Synodinos
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Use of parthenogenetic activation of human oocytes as an experimental model for evaluation of polar body based PGD assay performance.

Authors:  Alessio Paffoni; Valentina Paracchini; Stefania Ferrari; Claudia Scarduelli; Manuela Seia; Domenico A Coviello; Guido Ragni
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: state of the art 2011.

Authors:  Joyce C Harper; Sioban B Sengupta
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of P450 oxidoreductase deficiency and Huntington Disease using three different molecular approaches simultaneously.

Authors:  Trinitat M Alberola; Rosa Bautista-Llácer; Esther Fernández; Xavier Vendrell; Manuel Pérez-Alonso
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Conceptualizing couples' decision making in PGD: emerging cognitive, emotional, and moral dimensions.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Penny F Pierce
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-01-08

7.  Well-devised quantification analysis for duplication mutation of Duchenne muscular dystrophy aimed at preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Akira Nakabayashi; Kou Sueoka; Hiroto Tajima; Kenji Sato; Yoshiaki Sakamoto; Shingo Katou; Yasunori Yoshimura
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Karyomapping-a comprehensive means of simultaneous monogenic and cytogenetic PGD: comparison with standard approaches in real time for Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Alan R Thornhill; Alan H Handyside; Christian Ottolini; Senthil A Natesan; Jon Taylor; Karen Sage; Gary Harton; Kerry Cliffe; Nabeel Affara; Michalis Konstantinidis; Dagan Wells; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Successful implantation and live birth of a healthy boy after triple biopsy and double vitrification of oocyte-embryo-blastocyst.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Anil Biricik; Rocio P Cotarelo; Elisabetta Iammarone; Patrizia Rubino; Jan Tesarik; Francesco Fiorentino; Maria Giulia Minasi
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-01-14

Review 10.  New advances of preimplantation and prenatal genetic screening and noninvasive testing as a potential predictor of health status of babies.

Authors:  Tanya Milachich
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.