Literature DB >> 1630917

Escherichia coli promoters: neural networks develop distinct descriptions in learning to search for promoters of different spacing classes.

M C O'Neill1.   

Abstract

Back-propagation neural networks were trained to recognize promoter sequences of each of the three major spacing classes found in E. coli. These networks were trained with the object of maximizing their ability to generalize while maintaining the level of false positive identifications at a fraction of 1 percent. These objectives were generally met. Networks for the 16 base spacing class captured between 78 and 100% of previously unseen promoters in different tests; networks for the 17 base class identified 97% of the test promoters; networks for the 18 base class identified 79% of the test promoters. A tandem poll of networks for all three spacing classes produced a cumulative false positive level of less than 0.5%. In each case, the weight matrices used by the networks in their classification were analyzed to determine the relative weight assigned to the occurrence of a given base at a given position within the promoter. In this fashion, an approximate description of the network's definition of the promoter can be obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1630917      PMCID: PMC312504          DOI: 10.1093/nar/20.13.3471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  13 in total

1.  Training back-propagation neural networks to define and detect DNA-binding sites.

Authors:  M C O'Neill
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Hierarchies of base pair preferences in the P22 ant promoter.

Authors:  H Moyle; C Waldburger; M M Susskind
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Escherichia coli promoters. I. Consensus as it relates to spacing class, specificity, repeat substructure, and three-dimensional organization.

Authors:  M C O'Neill
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1989-04-05       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Information content of binding sites on nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  T D Schneider; G D Stormo; L Gold; A Ehrenfeucht
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1986-04-05       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Analysis of E. coli promoter sequences.

Authors:  C B Harley; R P Reynolds
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-03-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Neural network models for promoter recognition.

Authors:  A V Lukashin; V V Anshelevich; B R Amirikyan; A I Gragerov; M D Frank-Kamenetskii
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  1989-06

7.  Revised sequence of the tetracycline-resistance gene of pBR322.

Authors:  K W Peden
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.688

8.  Neural network optimization for E. coli promoter prediction.

Authors:  B Demeler; G W Zhou
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-04-11       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Consensus methods for finding and ranking DNA binding sites. Application to Escherichia coli promoters.

Authors:  M C O'Neill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1989-05-20       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  PL of coliphage lambda: an alternative solution for an efficient promoter.

Authors:  R Knaus; H Bujard
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Computational gene finding in plants.

Authors:  Mihaela Pertea; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  A hidden Markov model that finds genes in E. coli DNA.

Authors:  A Krogh; I S Mian; D Haussler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  A general procedure for locating and analyzing protein-binding sequence motifs in nucleic acids.

Authors:  M C O'Neill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Analysis of eukaryotic promoter sequences reveals a systematically occurring CT-signal.

Authors:  N I Larsen; J Engelbrecht; S Brunak
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-04-11       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  The Escherichia coli hflA locus encodes a putative GTP-binding protein and two membrane proteins, one of which contains a protease-like domain.

Authors:  J A Noble; M A Innis; E V Koonin; K E Rudd; F Banuett; I Herskowitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Functional organization of the bacteriophage PRD1 genome.

Authors:  A M Grahn; J K Bamford; M C O'Neill; D H Bamford
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Back-propagation and counter-propagation neural networks for phylogenetic classification of ribosomal RNA sequences.

Authors:  C Wu; S Shivakumar
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Non-canonical sequence elements in the promoter structure. Cluster analysis of promoters recognized by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.

Authors:  O N Ozoline; A A Deev; M V Arkhipova
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  An iterative strategy combining biophysical criteria and duration hidden Markov models for structural predictions of Chlamydia trachomatis sigma66 promoters.

Authors:  Ronna R Mallios; David M Ojcius; David H Ardell
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Quantitative design of regulatory elements based on high-precision strength prediction using artificial neural network.

Authors:  Hailin Meng; Jianfeng Wang; Zhiqiang Xiong; Feng Xu; Guoping Zhao; Yong Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.