Literature DB >> 16307621

Using a computer to teach patients about fecal occult blood screening. A randomized trial.

David P Miller1, James R Kimberly, L Douglas Case, James L Wofford.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a multimedia computer program could effectively teach patients about fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and increase screening rates.
DESIGN: Randomized trial.
SETTING: University-affiliated, community-based Internal Medicine outpatient practice. PARTICIPANTS: All English-speaking patients aged 50 years and older who were offered FOBT screening by their providers were invited to participate. Two hundred and four patients enrolled in the study. Ten patients were later determined to be ineligible.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to either the educational multimedia computer program or usual nurse counseling about FOBT screening. Screening instructions were based on the material pre-printed on each test kit. Educational sessions were held in a private setting immediately after each patient's office visit.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A knowledge-assessment questionnaire was administered in a blinded fashion by telephone the following day. Successful screening was defined as return of the test kits within 30 d. Completion of the FOBT kits was similar in both groups: 62% (58/93) in the computer group and 63% (64/101) in the nurse group (P=.89). Mean knowledge scores were also similar, but there was a trend toward increased knowledge mastery in the computer group (56% vs 41%, P=.09).
CONCLUSIONS: A multimedia educational computer program was as effective as usual nurse counseling in educating patients and achieving adherence to FOBT screening. Future studies are needed to determine whether computer-assisted instruction can improve health outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16307621      PMCID: PMC1490260          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0081.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  24 in total

1.  Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Somnath Saha; Tom Hoerger; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  A national survey of primary care physicians' colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Paul S Frame; Ann Meadow; Elizabeth Jones; Marion Nadel; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening tests.

Authors:  B S Ling; M A Moskowitz; D Wachs; B Pearson; P C Schroy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Recent trends in mortality rates for four major cancers, by sex and race/ethnicity--United States, 1990-1998.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  I M Rosenstock; V J Strecher; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1988

7.  Making "time" for preventive services.

Authors:  T E Kottke; M L Brekke; L I Solberg
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 8.  American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2004.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Hannon J Eyre
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Promoting early detection tests for colorectal carcinoma and adenomatous polyps: a framework for action: the strategic plan of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.

Authors:  Bernard Levin; Robert A Smith; Gabriel E Feldman; Graham A Colditz; Robert H Fletcher; Marion Nadel; David A Rothenberger; Paul S Schroy; Sally W Vernon; Richard Wender
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Benefits of a computer-assisted education program for hypertensive patients compared with standard education tools.

Authors:  S M Consoli; M Ben Said; J Jean; J Menard; P F Plouin; G Chatellier
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1995-09
View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative review.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Usha Menon; Allison Burness; Erica S Breslau
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  Estimating development cost for a tailored interactive computer program to enhance colorectal cancer screening compliance.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Yu-Chia Chang; Judith L Bettencourt; Sally W Vernon; Anthony Greisinger
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Cost-effectiveness of patient mailings to promote colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Calvin Franz; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael K Dougherty; Alison T Brenner; Seth D Crockett; Shivani Gupta; Stephanie B Wheeler; Manny Coker-Schwimmer; Laura Cubillos; Teri Malo; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 5.  Community-based colorectal cancer screening trials with multi-ethnic groups: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jay B Morrow; Florence J Dallo; Manjula Julka
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2010-12

6.  Health literacy and computer-assisted instruction: usability and patient preference.

Authors:  Vanessa Duren-Winfield; Elijah O Onsomu; Douglas L Case; Michael Pignone; David Miller
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-02-26

7.  Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Alan M Zaslavsky; Richard Marshall; Robert H Fletcher; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-23

8.  Does access to a colorectal cancer screening website and/or a nurse-managed telephone help line provided to patients by their family physician increase fecal occult blood test uptake?: A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial study protocol.

Authors:  Kathleen Clouston; Alan Katz; Patricia J Martens; Jeff Sisler; Donna Turner; Michelle Lobchuk; Susan McClement
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Primary care endorsement letter and a patient leaflet to improve participation in colorectal cancer screening: results of a factorial randomised trial.

Authors:  P Hewitson; A M Ward; C Heneghan; S P Halloran; D Mant
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Interventions to improve care related to colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review.

Authors:  Keith Naylor; James Ward; Blase N Polite
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.