Literature DB >> 12365008

Promoting early detection tests for colorectal carcinoma and adenomatous polyps: a framework for action: the strategic plan of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.

Bernard Levin1, Robert A Smith, Gabriel E Feldman, Graham A Colditz, Robert H Fletcher, Marion Nadel, David A Rothenberger, Paul S Schroy, Sally W Vernon, Richard Wender.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to provide health professionals, professional organizations, policy makers, and the general public with a practical blueprint for increasing the practice of screening for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and adenomatous polyps over the next decade. The National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable (NCCRT) was founded in 1997 by the American Cancer Society and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to provide strategic leadership, advocacy, long-range planning, and coordination of interventions targeted at reducing the disease burden of CRC through education, early detection, and prevention. The NCCRT and its three workgroups include CRC survivors; recognized experts in primary care, gastroenterology, radiology, colorectal surgery, nursing, public policy, epidemiology, and behavioral science; patient advocates; and representatives of health plans and insurers, government, and other organizations.
METHODS: The NCCRT performed a literature review of published and unpublished data related to CRC screening guidelines, compliance, and barriers to adherence, as well as test effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Members of the three NCCRT workgroups developed summary reports regarding professional education, public education and awareness, and health policy. A drafting committee developed the final strategic plan from workgroup reports, which was reviewed by the entire NCCRT membership, amended, and subsequently approved in final form. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Although the rationale for population-wide CRC screening is well established, the majority of adults in the U.S. are not currently being screened for CRC. Thus, the nation foregoes an opportunity to reduce CRC-related mortality by an estimated >or= 50%. To increase CRC screening rates, the issues of patient and physician barriers to screening, lack of universal coverage, lack of incentives to motivate adherence, and expanded infrastructure must be addressed. Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12365008     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  25 in total

1.  Gender differences in colorectal cancer incidence in the United States, 1975-2006.

Authors:  Peter N Abotchie; Sally W Vernon; Xianglin L Du
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Expert commentary--virtual colonoscopy: utility as a screening test for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Michael L Kochman; Bernard Levin
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-01-26

3.  Experience of a public health colorectal cancer testing program in Maryland.

Authors:  Diane M Dwyer; Carmela Groves; Annette Hopkins; Eithne Keelaghan; Fatma M Shebl; Barbara Andrews; Marsha Bienia; Eileen Steinberger
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 4.  Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Alyssa Bennett; Marie Zaiter; James R Marshall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Conference report--early cancer diagnosis: beating the odds.

Authors:  Sara M Mariani
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-08-03

6.  Feasible economic strategies to improve screening compliance for colorectal cancer in Korea.

Authors:  Sang Min Park; Young Ho Yun; Soonman Kwon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  When even people at high risk do not take up colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Using a computer to teach patients about fecal occult blood screening. A randomized trial.

Authors:  David P Miller; James R Kimberly; L Douglas Case; James L Wofford
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  The American College of Gastroenterology and the 80% by 2018 Colorectal Cancer Initiative: A Multifaceted Approach to Maximize Screening Rates.

Authors:  Jordan J Karlitz; Anne-Louise B Oliphant; David A Greenwald; Mark B Pochapin
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Advantages of the AMDL-ELISA DR-70 (FDP) assay over carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for monitoring colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Andrea L Small-Howard; Holden Harris
Journal:  J Immunoassay Immunochem       Date:  2010
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.