Literature DB >> 16303933

Refractive error, ocular biometry, and lens opalescence in an adult population: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.

Chrisandra Shufelt1, Samantha Fraser-Bell, Mei Ying-Lai, Mina Torres, Rohit Varma.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize age- and gender-related differences in refractive error, ocular biometry, and lens opalescence (NOP) in a population-based sample of adult Latinos. Also assessed were the determinants of age-related refractive differences.
METHODS: Participants in the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study (LALES), a population-based study of Latinos aged 40 years and more, underwent an ophthalmic examination, including ultrasonic measurements of axial length (AL), vitreous chamber depth (VCD), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and noncycloplegic automated and subjective refraction. Corneal curvature/power (CP) was measured using an autorefractor. NOP was graded at the slit lamp by an ophthalmologist using the Lens Opacity Classification System II. Age- and gender-related differences were calculated. Multiple regression models were used to identify the determinants of age-related refractive differences.
RESULTS: Of the 6357 LALES participants, 5588 phakic individuals with biometric data were included in this analysis. Older individuals had shallower ACDs, thicker lenses, more NOP, and more hyperopia compared to younger individuals (P < 0.001). There was no age-related difference in AL (P > or = 0.05). Women had significantly shorter AL, shallower ACD and VCD, than did men (P < or = 0.01). The strongest determinants of refractive error were AL (primarily VCD) and CP. NOP was a small but significant determinant of refractive error in older individuals.
CONCLUSIONS: Age- and gender-related differences in ocular biometric, refractive error, and NOP measurements are present in adult Latinos. While the relative contribution of NOP in determining refractive error is small, it is greater in older persons compared to younger individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16303933     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-0435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  54 in total

1.  Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Susan Vitale; Leon Ellwein; Mary Frances Cotch; Frederick L Ferris; Robert Sperduto
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08

2.  Ocular biometry and open-angle glaucoma: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.

Authors:  Aaron A Kuzin; Rohit Varma; Harsha S Reddy; Mina Torres; Stanley P Azen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Crystalline lens paradoxes revisited: significance of age-related restructuring of the GRIN.

Authors:  Conor J Sheil; Alexander V Goncharov
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Impact of Cognitive Demand during Sustained Near Tasks in Children and Adults.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Ruth E Manny; Julia S Benoit; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Ocular Determinants of Refractive Error and Its Age- and Sex-Related Variations in the Chinese American Eye Study.

Authors:  Grace M Richter; Mingwu Wang; Xuejuan Jiang; Shuang Wu; Dandan Wang; Mina Torres; Farzana Choudhury; Rohit Varma
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 7.389

6.  Evaluation of the repeatability of a swept-source ocular biometer for measuring ocular biometric parameters.

Authors:  Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; Alberto Domínguez-Vicent; José J Esteve-Taboada; Miguel A Aloy; Jose E Adsuara; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Variation of Axial Ocular Dimensions with Age, Sex, Height, BMI-and Their Relation to Refractive Status.

Authors:  Abhijit Roy; Maitreyee Kar; Dhruba Mandal; Ramen Sinha Ray; Chinmaya Kar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-01-01

8.  Comparison of the biometric values obtained by two different A-mode ultrasound devices (Eye Cubed vs. PalmScan): a transversal, descriptive, and comparative study.

Authors:  Raul Velez-Montoya; Eugene Mark Shusterman; Miriam Jessica López-Miranda; Mariana Mayorquin-Ruiz; Guillermo Salcedo-Villanueva; Hugo Quiroz-Mercado; Virgilio Morales-Cantón
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Association of age, stature, and education with ocular dimensions in an older white population.

Authors:  Kristine E Lee; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Zoe Quandt; Tien Yin Wong
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01

10.  A genome-wide association analysis identified a novel susceptible locus for pathological myopia at 11q24.1.

Authors:  Hideo Nakanishi; Ryo Yamada; Norimoto Gotoh; Hisako Hayashi; Kenji Yamashiro; Noriaki Shimada; Kyoko Ohno-Matsui; Manabu Mochizuki; Masaaki Saito; Tomohiro Iida; Keitaro Matsuo; Kazuo Tajima; Nagahisa Yoshimura; Fumihiko Matsuda
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.