Literature DB >> 16303290

Individual differences in brain activity during visuo-spatial processing assessed by slow cortical potentials and LORETA.

Claus Lamm1, Florian Ph S Fischmeister, Herbert Bauer.   

Abstract

Using slow-cortical potentials (SCPs), Vitouch et al. demonstrated that subjects with low ability to solve a complex visuo-spatial imagery task show higher activity in occipital, parietal and frontal cortex during task processing than subjects with high ability. This finding has been interpreted in the sense of the so-called "neural efficiency" hypothesis, which assumes that the central nervous system of individuals with higher intellectual abilities is functioning in a more efficient way than the one of individuals with lower abilities. Using a higher spatial resolution of SCP recordings, and by employing the source localization method of LORETA (low-resolution electromagnetic tomography), we investigated this hypothesis by performing an extended replication of Vitouch et al.'s study. SCPs during processing of a visuo-spatial imagery task were recorded in pre-selected subjects with either high or low abilities in solving the imagery task. Topographic and LORETA analyses of SCPs revealed that a distributed network of extrastriate occipital, superior parietal, temporal, medial frontal and prefrontal areas was active during task solving. This network is well in line with former studies of the functional neuroanatomy of visuo-spatial imagery. Contrary to our expectations, however, the results of Vitouch et al. as well as of other studies supporting the neural efficiency hypothesis could not be confirmed since no difference in brain activity between groups was observed. This inconsistency between studies might be due to differing task processing strategies. While subjects with high abilities in the Vitouch et al. study seemed to use a visuo-perceptual task solving approach, all other subjects relied upon a visuo-motor task processing strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16303290     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  8 in total

1.  The contribution of electrophysiology to functional connectivity mapping.

Authors:  Marieke L Schölvinck; David A Leopold; Matthew J Brookes; Patrick H Khader
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Slow cortical potentials capture decision processes during temporal discounting.

Authors:  Felix Oswald; Uta Sailer
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  All about the Money - External Performance Monitoring is Affected by Monetary, but Not by Socially Conveyed Feedback Cues in More Antisocial Individuals.

Authors:  Daniela Melitta Pfabigan; Johanna Alexopoulos; Herbert Bauer; Claus Lamm; Uta Sailer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Early event-related potentials indicate context-specific target processing for eye and hand motor systems.

Authors:  Claudia C Wehrspaun; Daniela M Pfabigan; Uta Sailer
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.304

5.  Feelings of helplessness increase ERN amplitudes in healthy individuals.

Authors:  D M Pfabigan; N M Pintzinger; D R Siedek; C Lamm; B Derntl; U Sailer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Exploring the effects of antisocial personality traits on brain potentials during face processing.

Authors:  Daniela M Pfabigan; Johanna Alexopoulos; Uta Sailer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Fearless Dominance and reduced feedback-related negativity amplitudes in a time-estimation task - further neuroscientific evidence for dual-process models of psychopathy.

Authors:  Stefan Schulreich; Daniela M Pfabigan; Birgit Derntl; Uta Sailer
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Mental rotation of sequentially presented 3D figures: sex and sex hormones related differences in behavioural and ERP measures.

Authors:  Ramune Griksiene; Aurina Arnatkeviciute; Rasa Monciunskaite; Thomas Koenig; Osvaldas Ruksenas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.