Literature DB >> 23968690

Early event-related potentials indicate context-specific target processing for eye and hand motor systems.

Claudia C Wehrspaun1, Daniela M Pfabigan, Uta Sailer.   

Abstract

Concurrent eye and hand movements toward a common visual target require different motor programs based on identical visual input. We used event-related brain potentials (ERP) to determine if and when the processing of the visual target differs for the two motor systems. The N2, an index for target evaluation, was more negative for the target of a hand than of an eye movement in two experiments. A possible interpretation for this finding is different visual target processing. Targets for hand movements require a different weighting of visual information, for example concerning features such as surface structure which are important for hand but not for eye movements. In experiment 2, the early C1-component, which had an average maximum at 67 ms following target onset, was significantly more negative when subjects pointed at the stimuli. Traditionally, the C1 has been regarded as a sensory component, but recent studies have linked it to higher order processing, such as attention and expectations. Thus, the present data indicate that target processing for eye or hand movements is already context-specific during early visual information processing. We suggest that differences in a target's relevance for upcoming movements modify target processing as well as sensory expectations.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; C1-component; EEG; Eye–hand-coordination; N2-component; Sensory expectation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23968690      PMCID: PMC3867658          DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2013.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Res        ISSN: 0168-0102            Impact factor:   3.304


  35 in total

1.  Frontal evaluation and posterior representation in target detection.

Authors:  G F Potts; D M Tucker
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-03

Review 2.  Implications of distracter effects for the organization of eye movements, hand movements, and perception.

Authors:  Uta Sailer; Thomas Eggert; Andreas Straube
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.453

3.  Decoupling eye and hand movement control: visual short-term memory influences reach planning more than saccade planning.

Authors:  Laurel A Issen; David C Knill
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Top-down effects on early visual processing in humans: a predictive coding framework.

Authors:  Karsten Rauss; Sophie Schwartz; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Age-related effects of novel visual stimuli in a letter-matching task: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  István Czigler; László Balázs
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2005-01-08       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  Manual response preparation and saccade programming are linked to attention shifts: ERP evidence for covert attentional orienting and spatially specific modulations of visual processing.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; José Van Velzen; Elena Gherri; Clare Press
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  A balanced non-cephalic reference electrode.

Authors:  W A STEPHENSON; F A GIBBS
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1951-05

8.  Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. II. Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double-step stimulus.

Authors:  D Pélisson; C Prablanc; M A Goodale; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Operant conditioning of brain steady potential shifts in man.

Authors:  H Bauer; W Lauber
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1979-06

10.  Electrical neuroimaging evidence that spatial frequency-based selective attention affects V1 activity as early as 40-60 ms in humans.

Authors:  Alice M Proverbio; Marzia Del Zotto; Alberto Zani
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.