Literature DB >> 16297974

Genetic testing for colon cancer among African-Americans in North Carolina.

Jessie A Satia1, Susan McRitchie, Lawrence L Kupper, Chanita Hughes Halbert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe attitudes and correlates of intention to take a genetic test for colon cancer in a population-based sample of African-Americans.
METHODS: African-Americans (n = 658), age 18-70, in North Carolina completed an 11-page questionnaire between June-October 2003 that assessed attitudes (familiarity, perceived benefits and risks, anxiety, and confidentiality) and intention to take a genetic test for colon cancer and various participant characteristics.
RESULTS: Respondents expressed favorable attitudes and high intention regarding genetic testing for colon cancer: 87% would definitely/probably take a genetic test, although only 42% had read/heard a lot or some about genetic testing. Most agreed that genetic test results should be available to healthcare providers (79%) but not to health insurers (62%) or employers (82%). About a third were concerned that genetic testing could lead to discrimination. Correlates of intention differed by sex. Perceived benefits were significantly positively associated with intention among all respondents. However, being married (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.2, 3.7), doctor as the main source of health information (OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.4, 3.9), and colon cancer family history (OR = 4.3, 95% CI: 1.6, 11.6) were significant only for women; some college education (OR = 4.1, 95% CI: 1.7, 9.7), importance of sharing test results with relatives (OR = 5.5, 95% CI: 1.6, 18.7), and colon cancer screening history (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.6, 7.5) were only significant for men.
CONCLUSIONS: Respondents expressed high interest in genetic testing for colon cancer risk, although confidentiality of test results is a concern. Guidelines and policies for genetic testing specific to African-Americans should be established and future research should examine the prevalence of genetic testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16297974     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  10 in total

1.  Leveraging Implementation Science to Address Health Disparities in Genomic Medicine: Examples from the Field.

Authors:  Megan C Roberts; George A Mensah; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 1.847

2.  Familial risk of cancer and knowledge and use of genetic testing.

Authors:  Heather J Baer; Phyllis Brawarsky; Michael F Murray; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Willingness to participate in genomics research and desire for personal results among underrepresented minority patients: a structured interview study.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Michael A Diefenbach; Randi Zinberg; Carol R Horowitz; Margaret Smirnoff; Micol Zweig; Samantha Streicher; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Lynne D Richardson
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-06-22

4.  Breast Cancer Genetics Knowledge and Testing Intentions among Nigerian Professional Women.

Authors:  Samuel O Ngene; Babatunde Adedokun; Prisca Adejumo; Olufunmilayo Olopade
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Perceptions of African-American health professionals and community members on the participation of children and pregnant women in genetic research.

Authors:  E M Ngui; T D Warner; L W Roberts
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli Murphy-Bollinger; Joan Scott; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Colorectal cancer cases and relatives of cases indicate similar willingness to receive and disclose genetic information.

Authors:  Rachel M Ceballos; Polly A Newcomb; Jeannette M Beasley; Scot Peterson; Allyson Templeton; Julie R Hunt
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2008-09

8.  Survey of US public attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  S B Haga; J M O'Daniel; G M Tindall; I R Lipkus; R Agans
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 9.  Awareness, knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes towards genetic testing for cancer risk among ethnic minority groups: a systematic review.

Authors:  Katie E J Hann; Madeleine Freeman; Lindsay Fraser; Jo Waller; Saskia C Sanderson; Belinda Rahman; Lucy Side; Sue Gessler; Anne Lanceley
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Interest in genetic testing among affected men from hereditary prostate cancer families and their unaffected male relatives.

Authors:  Julie N Harris; Deborah J Bowen; Alan Kuniyuki; Laura McIntosh; Liesel M FitzGerald; Elaine A Ostrander; Janet L Stanford
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 8.822

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.