Literature DB >> 16296216

Factors that correlate with the U.S. Medical Licensure Examination Step-2 scores in a diverse medical student population.

Dotun Ogunyemi1, De Shawn Taylor-Harris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess factors that correlate with performance on U.S. Medical Licensure Examination (USMLE) Step-2 examination. Our hypothesis was that demographic factors, faculty assessments and other standardized test scores will correlate with students' performance on USMLE Step 2. STUDY
DESIGN: A comparison of standardized examinations and demographic factors with USMLE Step-2 scores as the outcome variable was accomplished using the educational records of 171 medical students.
RESULTS: Mean USMLE Step 2, USMLE Step 1, NBME-OB/GYN and MCAT scores, respectively, were 190.63, 194.53, 67.47 and 24.03. Positive correlations of USMLE Step 2 were: USMLE Step-1 scores (r=0.681, p=0.000); MCAT scores (r=0.524, p=0.000); NBME-OB/GYN scores (r=0.614, p=0.000); year of OB/GYN rotation (r=0.432, p=0.000); faculty grades (r=0.400, p=0.000); undergraduate GPA (r=0.287, p=0.000); and science GPA (r=0.255, p=0.002). Negative correlations of USMLE Step 2 were students' increasing age (r=-0.405, p=0.000), increasing number of MCAT attempts (r=-0.182, p=0.000) and increasing number of NBME-OB/GYN attempts (r=-0.310, p=0.000). There was no correlation with gender or race. Logistic regression analysis showed that a failing NBME-OB/GYN score (p=0.008), failing USMLE Step-1 score (p=0.01), failing faculty grade (p=0.029) and multiple MCAT attempts (p=0.033) independently increased the risk of failing USMLE Step 2.
CONCLUSIONS: Premedical test-taking abilities (MCAT scores), results of preclinical standardized tests (USMLE Step 1) and performance on clinical rotations (NBME-OB/GYN score and faculty grade) correlate significantly with USMLE scores. These findings may assist educators in selecting medical students at risk of performing poorly on the USMLE Step-2 examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16296216      PMCID: PMC2594776     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  5 in total

1.  The quality of in-house medical school examinations.

Authors:  Ralph F Jozefowicz; Bruce M Koeppen; Susan Case; Robert Galbraith; David Swanson; Robert H Glew
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Medical licensure examination scores: relationship to obstetrics and gynecology examination scores.

Authors:  Thomas D Myles; Robert C Henderson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  NBME Obstetrics and Gynecology clerkship final examination scores: predictive value of standardized tests and demographic factors.

Authors:  Dotun Ogunyemi; Shawn De Taylor-Harris
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.142

4.  Predictors of performance on the National Board of Medical Examiners obstetrics and gynecology subject examination.

Authors:  A Armstrong; C Dahl; W Haffner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Use of the USMLE to select residents.

Authors:  E S Berner; C M Brooks; J B Erdmann
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.893

  5 in total
  17 in total

1.  Neurology clerkship goals and their effect on learning and satisfaction.

Authors:  Roy E Strowd; Rachel Marie E Salas; Tiana E Cruz; Charlene E Gamaldo
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Prolonged delays for research training in medical school are associated with poorer subsequent clinical knowledge.

Authors:  Liselotte N Dyrbye; Matthew R Thomas; Neena Natt; Charles H Rohren
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Associations between United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) and Internal Medicine In-Training Examination (IM-ITE) scores.

Authors:  Furman S McDonald; Scott L Zeger; Joseph C Kolars
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Does the Intercollegiate Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) examination predict 'on-the-job' performance during UK higher specialty surgical training?

Authors:  Dsg Scrimgeour; P A Brennan; G Griffiths; A J Lee; Fct Smith; J Cleland
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Predictors of success in the Intercollegiate Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) examination.

Authors:  Dsg Scrimgeour; J Cleland; A J Lee; P A Brennan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Does Participation in Obstetrics and Gynecology Subspecialties Improve Clerkship Outcomes?

Authors:  Merima Ruhotina; Brittany Star Hampton
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-01-24

7.  Predictive value of grade point average (GPA), Medical College Admission Test (MCAT), internal examinations (Block) and National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) scores on Medical Council of Canada qualifying examination part I (MCCQE-1) scores.

Authors:  Banibrata Roy; Ira Ripstein; Kyle Perry; Barry Cohen
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2016-03-31

8.  Do MCAT scores predict USMLE scores? An analysis on 5 years of medical student data.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Gauer; Josephine M Wolff; J Brooks Jackson
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2016-09-30

9.  Impact of clinical performance examination on incoming interns' clinical competency in differential diagnosis of headache.

Authors:  Seong-Min Park; Yun-Mi Song; Bo-Kyoung Kim; Hyoeun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Fam Med       Date:  2014-03-24

10.  Predictors of medical school clerkship performance: a multispecialty longitudinal analysis of standardized examination scores and clinical assessments.

Authors:  Petra M Casey; Brian A Palmer; Geoffrey B Thompson; Torrey A Laack; Matthew R Thomas; Martha F Hartz; Jani R Jensen; Benjamin J Sandefur; Julie E Hammack; Jerry W Swanson; Robert D Sheeler; Joseph P Grande
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.