Literature DB >> 16295263

Protecting subjects who cannot give consent: toward a better standard for "minimal" risks.

David Wendler1.   

Abstract

When children and incapacitated adults are enrolled in research that cannot directly benefit them, they can be exposed to no more than "minimal" risks, according to guidelines accepted around the world. We need a new standard for what "minimal" risks are, however--one that recognizes that participating in non-beneficial research is like participating in a charitable activity. Such a standard appears likely to provide more stringent protections for these vulnerable populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16295263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep        ISSN: 0093-0334            Impact factor:   2.683


  15 in total

1.  Vulnerable populations in research: the case of the seriously ill.

Authors:  Philip J Nickel
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2006

2.  Minimal Risk in Pediatric Research: A Philosophical Review and Reconsideration.

Authors:  John Rossi; Robert M Nelson
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Evaluating the risks of clinical research: direct comparative analysis.

Authors:  Annette Rid; Emily Abdoler; Roxann Roberson-Nay; Daniel S Pine; David Wendler
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.576

4.  Do U.S. regulations allow more than minor increase over minimal risk pediatric research? Should they?

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec

5.  On Power and Freedom: Extending the Definition of Coercion.

Authors:  Sonia M Goltz
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2020-01-06

6.  Setting risk thresholds in biomedical research: lessons from the debate about minimal risk.

Authors:  Annette Rid
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2014 Mar-Jun

7.  Minimal risk in research involving pregnant women and fetuses.

Authors:  Carson Strong
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  Minimal or reasonable? Considering the ethical threshold for research risks to nonconsenting bystanders and implications for nonconsenting participants.

Authors:  Holly Fernandez Lynch
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 9.  Genetic research on biospecimens poses minimal risk.

Authors:  David S Wendler; Annette Rid
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 11.639

10.  Should protections for research with humans who cannot consent apply to research with nonhuman primates?

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.