Literature DB >> 21871047

Minimal risk in research involving pregnant women and fetuses.

Carson Strong1.   

Abstract

The concept of minimal risk plays a key role in federal regulations on the protection of human research subjects. Although there has been considerable discussion of the meaning of minimal risk, the question of how this concept should be interpreted in research involving pregnant women and fetuses has not been addressed. This essay reviews the literature on minimal risk and argues for an interpretation of that concept in the context of research involving pregnant women and fetuses.
© 2011 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21871047      PMCID: PMC3250991          DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00619.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  24 in total

1.  Protection of human subjects: categories of research that may be reviewed by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) through an expedited review procedure--FDA. Notice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1998-11-09

Review 2.  Eliminating the daily life risks standard from the definition of minimal risk.

Authors:  D B Resnik
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Protecting subjects who cannot give consent: toward a better standard for "minimal" risks.

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

Review 4.  In utero gene therapy: current challenges and perspectives.

Authors:  Simon N Waddington; M Gabriela Kramer; Ruben Hernandez-Alcoceba; Suzanne M K Buckley; Michael Themis; Charles Coutelle; Jesus Prieto
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 11.454

5.  Quantifying the federal minimal risk standard: implications for pediatric research without a prospect of direct benefit.

Authors:  David Wendler; Leah Belsky; Kimberly M Thompson; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Sonographic diagnosis of the amniotic band syndrome.

Authors:  D J Burton; R A Filly
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  In loco parentis. Minimal risk as an ethical threshold for research upon children.

Authors:  B Freedman; A Fuks; C Weijer
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

8.  Age-specific risk of fetal loss observed in a second trimester serum screening population.

Authors:  Philip R Wyatt; Titus Owolabi; Chris Meier; Tianhua Huang
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 9.  Minimal risk as an international ethical standard in research.

Authors:  Loretta M Kopelman
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2004-06

10.  Assessment of risk in research on children.

Authors:  J Janofsky; B Starfield
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.406

View more
  1 in total

1.  Community-Engaged Approaches to Address the Ethical Concerns of Maternal Mental Health Disparities Research.

Authors:  Natalie D Hernandez; Jemea Dorsey; Danette McLaurin Glass; Erika Pope; Natasha Worthy; Elise Blasingame; Jewell Gooding; Pamela Braxton; Mica Whitfield; Yosha Dotson
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2019
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.