Literature DB >> 32440648

On Power and Freedom: Extending the Definition of Coercion.

Sonia M Goltz1.   

Abstract

Defining coercion has been a topic of interest to behavior analysts from time to time. Given the more and more subtle influence strategies that technology has enabled, it is time to revisit these definitions. This article examines the definitions of power, freedom, and coercion in behavior analysis, comparing them to philosophical views of power, freedom, and coercion. Two extensions to the definition of coercion are suggested. First, definitions could include as coercive the removal of resources needed to generate the responses required to obtain reinforcement, or in some cases, the neglect to provide these resources. Second, choice architecture systems that are not transparent to the individuals being influenced and for which their consent has not been provided could be considered to be coercive. Implications of these extensions are discussed, including the need to examine behavior management methods for interactions considered to be coercive under the new definitions. © Association for Behavior Analysis International 2020.

Keywords:  Choice architecture; Coercion; Freedom; Power

Year:  2020        PMID: 32440648      PMCID: PMC7198671          DOI: 10.1007/s40614-019-00240-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci        ISSN: 2520-8969


  23 in total

1.  Toward a constructional approach to social problems: ethical and constitutional issues raised by applied behavior analysis.

Authors:  Israel Goldiamond
Journal:  Behaviorism       Date:  1974

2.  Raising voice, risking retaliation: Events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace.

Authors:  Lilia M Cortina; Vicki J Magley
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  2003-10

3.  Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behaviors: fact or fiction?

Authors:  P M Podsakoff; W D Todor; R A Grover; V L Huber
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Perform       Date:  1984-08

4.  Effects of leader contingent and noncontingent reward and punishment behaviors on subordinate performance and satisfaction.

Authors:  P M Podsakoff; W D Todor; R Skov
Journal:  Acad Manage J       Date:  1982-12

5.  Protection of human subjects and patients: a social contingency analysis of distinctions between research and practice, and its implications.

Authors:  Israel Goldiamond
Journal:  Behaviorism       Date:  1976

6.  Differentiating social and personal power: opposite effects on stereotyping, but parallel effects on behavioral approach tendencies.

Authors:  Joris Lammers; Janka I Stoker; Diederik A Stapel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-11-09

7.  Countercontrol in behavior analysis.

Authors:  Dennis J Delprato
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2002

8.  The dynamics of punishment and trust.

Authors:  Long Wang; J Keith Murnighan
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2017-05-04

9.  Social decoys: Leveraging choice architecture to alter social preferences.

Authors:  Linda W Chang; Mina Cikara
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2018-08

10.  Improving capacity and consent to treatment recording in psychiatric inpatient wards: A multi-centre quality improvement project.

Authors:  Ching Li; Judith Stellman; Nitisha Patel; Florence Dalton
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2016-12-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.