Literature DB >> 1629489

Speech of cochlear implant patients: a longitudinal study of vowel production.

J Perkell1, H Lane, M Svirsky, J Webster.   

Abstract

Acoustic parameters were measured for vowels spoken in /hVd/ context by four postlingually deafened recipients of multichannel (Ineraid) cochlear implants. Three of the subjects became totally deaf in adulthood after varying periods of partial hearing loss; the fourth became totally deaf at age four. The subjects received different degrees of perceptual benefit from the prosthesis. Recordings were made before, and at intervals following speech processor activation. The measured parameters included F1, F2, F0, SPL, duration, and amplitude difference between the first two harmonic peaks in the log magnitude spectrum (H 1-H2). Numerous changes in parameter values were observed from pre- to post-implant, with differences among subjects. Many changes, but not all, were in the direction of normative data, and most changes were consistent with hypotheses about relations among the parameters. Some of the changes tended to enhance phonemic contrasts; others had the opposite effect. For three subjects, H 1-H2 changed in a direction consistent with measurements of their average air flow when reading; that relation was more complex for the fourth subject. The results are interpreted with respect to: characteristics of the individual subjects, including vowel identification scores; mechanical interactions among glottal and supraglottal articulations; and hypotheses about the role of auditory feedback in the control of speech production. Almost all the observed differences could be attributed to changes in the average settings of speaking rate, F0 and SPL, which presumably can be perceived without the need for spectral place information. Some observed F2 realignment may be attributable to the reception of spectral cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1629489     DOI: 10.1121/1.402932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Perception and production of /r/ allophones improve with hearing from a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Melanie L Matthies; Frank H Guenther; Margaret Denny; Joseph S Perkell; Ellen Burton; Jennell Vick; Harlan Lane; Mark Tiede; Majid Zandipour
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Contributions of Auditory and Somatosensory Feedback to Vocal Motor Control.

Authors:  Dante J Smith; Cara Stepp; Frank H Guenther; Elaine Kearney
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Thomas M Talavage; Shivank Sinha; Heidi Neuburger; Mahan Azadpour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The effect of cochlear implantation and post-operative rehabilitation on acoustic voice analysis in post-lingual hearing impaired adults.

Authors:  Sabah M Hassan; Khalid H Malki; Tamer A Mesallam; Mohamad Farahat; Manal Bukhari; Thomas Murry
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Spoken word recognition in adolescent cochlear implant users during quiet and multispeaker babble conditions.

Authors:  Emily A Tobey; Sujin Shin; Madhu Sundarrajan; Ann E Geers
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.

Authors:  Ashley Farris-Trimble; Bob McMurray; Nicole Cigrand; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Functional and structural aging of the speech sensorimotor neural system: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence.

Authors:  Pascale Tremblay; Anthony S Dick; Steven L Small
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Audio-vocal system regulation in children with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Nicole Russo; Charles Larson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Sensorimotor control of vocal pitch and formant frequencies in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Fatemeh Mollaei; Douglas M Shiller; Shari R Baum; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Strength of British English accents in altered listening conditions.

Authors:  Peter Howell; William Barry; David Vinson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.