Literature DB >> 1629358

Restrictive workplace smoking policies: impact on nonsmokers' tobacco exposure.

B H Marcus, K M Emmons, D B Abrams, R J Marshall, M Kane, T E Novotny, R A Etzel.   

Abstract

The health consequences of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) are well documented. Although nonsmokers are generally aware of the health risks of ETS exposure, the majority of nonsmokers are regularly exposed. The most common source of exposure is the workplace. Restrictive workplace smoking policies are being used as a primary means of reducing ETS exposure. However, few studies have focused on the relation between workplace policy and ETS exposure. We performed two studies which examined the relationship between smoking policy, self-reported ETS exposure, and salivary cotinine concentrations. Study I, a pilot study, focused on a workplace-based sample of 106 volunteers; Study 2 examined exposure among 881 nonsmokers in workplace settings. In both studies, more restrictive workplace smoking policies were associated with a lower proportion of nonsmoking volunteers with detectable salivary cotinine. In Study 2, the larger study, the only other variable found to be significantly related to cotinine detection was the presence of smokers in the home. These results suggest that restrictive workplace smoking policies may reduce employees' overall ETS exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1629358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Policy        ISSN: 0197-5897            Impact factor:   2.222


  14 in total

1.  Medium-sized business employees speak out about smoking.

Authors:  C K Mikanowicz; D C Fitzgerald; M Leslie; N H Altman
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1999-12

2.  The impact of workplace smoking ordinances in California on smoking cessation.

Authors:  J M Moskowitz; Z Lin; E S Hudes
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Smoking in correctional facilities: a survey of employees.

Authors:  M J Carpenter; J R Hughes; L J Solomon; T A Powell
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Strength of clean indoor air laws and smoking related outcomes in the USA.

Authors:  K M McMullen; R C Brownson; D Luke; J Chriqui
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Correlates of household smoking bans among Chinese Americans.

Authors:  Donna Shelley; Marianne C Fahs; Rajeev Yerneni; Jiaojie Qu; Dee Burton
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Integrating individual and public health perspectives for treatment of tobacco dependence under managed health care: a combined stepped-care and matching model.

Authors:  D B Abrams; C T Orleans; R S Niaura; M G Goldstein; J O Prochaska; W Velicer
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1996

7.  Worksite tobacco prevention in the Canton of Zurich: stages of change, predictors, and outcomes.

Authors:  Verena Friedrich; Adrian Brügger; Georg Bauer
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-10       Impact factor: 3.380

8.  A longitudinal assessment of the impact of smoke-free worksite policies on tobacco use.

Authors:  Joseph E Bauer; Andrew Hyland; Qiang Li; Craig Steger; K Michael Cummings
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The impact of clean indoor air exemptions and preemption policies on the prevalence of a tobacco-specific lung carcinogen among nonsmoking bar and restaurant workers.

Authors:  Michael J Stark; Kristen Rohde; Julie E Maher; Barbara A Pizacani; Clyde W Dent; Ronda Bard; Steven G Carmella; Adam R Benoit; Nicole M Thomson; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Smoker-free workplace policies: developing a model of public health consequences of workplace policies barring employment to smokers.

Authors:  B Houle; M Siegel
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.