Literature DB >> 10593424

Medium-sized business employees speak out about smoking.

C K Mikanowicz1, D C Fitzgerald, M Leslie, N H Altman.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A health promotion study, funded by a state health department to meet objectives 3.4 and 3.11 of Healthy People 2000, was designed to: (1) identify tobacco use; (2) assess employees' beliefs on one's health and family member's health; and (3) assess the type of smoking policies favored. Using the Health Belief Model, it was hypothesized that there were differences in the health beliefs of tobacco users, former users, and never users. A 34-item questionnaire was administered to 1090 employees with a return rate of 603 (55%).
RESULTS: tobacco users perceived weight control and reduction of tension as benefits; they accepted warning label as hazardous but reported smokeless not as harmful; they perceived heart disease and cancer as related to tobacco use; and 62% had tried to quit smoking. Former and never users wanted "total ban policies" while, tobacco users wanted "designated areas" for smoking. All perceived their smoking and environmental tobacco smoke hazardous to their health and the health of family.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10593424     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018794522623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  22 in total

1.  Surgeon General's report on the health benefits of smoking cessation.

Authors:  A C Novello
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Protection from environmental tobacco smoke in California. The case for a smoke-free workplace.

Authors:  R Borland; J P Pierce; D M Burns; E Gilpin; M Johnson; D Bal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-08-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Smoking prohibition in the workplace and smoking cessation in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Authors:  H Brenner; A Mielck
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 4.  Passive smoking and heart disease. Epidemiology, physiology, and biochemistry.

Authors:  S A Glantz; W W Parmley
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  The Surgeon General's 1989 Report on Reducing the Health Consequences of Smoking: 25 Years of Progress.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Suppl       Date:  1989-03-24

6.  Marriage to a smoker and lung cancer risk.

Authors:  C G Humble; J M Samet; D R Pathak
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Workplace smoking policies in New Jersey businesses.

Authors:  E M Lewit; M Botsko; S Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Effects of a restricted work-site smoking policy on employees who smoke.

Authors:  J Brigham; J Gross; M L Stitzer; L J Felch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Cancer incidence and mortality, 1973-1995: a report card for the U.S.

Authors:  P A Wingo; L A Ries; H M Rosenberg; D S Miller; B K Edwards
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Lower levels of cigarette consumption found in smoke-free workplaces in California.

Authors:  T J Woodruff; B Rosbrook; J Pierce; S A Glantz
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-06-28
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Stephanie Diepeveen; Tom Ling; Marc Suhrcke; Martin Roland; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.295

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.