Literature DB >> 3141153

Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea.

R A Bowman1, T V Riley.   

Abstract

This paper reviews the various laboratory procedures available for the isolation and identification of Clostridium difficile and the detection of toxins produced by this organism. Laboratories should be selective in determining which patients require investigation for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea. Transport and storage of stool specimens at 4 degrees C is recommended when delays in processing may occur. Tissue culture techniques are still the best method for detection of cytotoxin and a variety of cell lines can be used. Other methods for detecting cytotoxin, and methods for detecting other toxins are not sufficiently developed yet to warrant introduction into diagnostic laboratories. Culture techniques remain the most sensitive for diagnosis, particularly since the development of a variety of enrichment techniques. Cycloserine cefoxitin fructose agar is still adequate, although reduced concentrations of antimicrobial agents are necessary, and improvements, such as the addition of sodium taurocholate, increase the recovery of spores. Enrichment cultures have markedly increased isolation rates for Clostridium difficile but the significance of these isolates needs to be carefully evaluated. Until simpler and more reliable tests are available in clinical laboratories for the detection of toxins, the isolation of Clostridium difficile from patients with diarrhoeal disease should be considered paramount.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3141153     DOI: 10.1007/bf01962596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  67 in total

1.  Detection of Clostridium difficile cytotoxin in HEp-2 and CHO cell lines.

Authors:  P R Murray; C J Weber
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.803

2.  Comparison of bacterial isolation, cytotoxicity assay, and counterimmunoelectrophoresis for the detection of Clostridium difficile and its toxin.

Authors:  W Jarvis; O Nunez-Montiel; F Thompson; V Dowell; M Towns; G Morris; E Hill
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Evaluation of the 24-h API 20A anaerobe system for identification of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  M E Gresser; C J Shanholtzer; D N Gerding; C R Garrett; L R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of two toxins produced by Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  N S Taylor; G M Thorne; J G Bartlett
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  A selective broth for Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  S M Carroll; R A Bowman; T V Riley
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.306

6.  Clostridium difficile in gnotobiotic mice.

Authors:  A B Onderdonk; R L Cisneros; J G Bartlett
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Epidemiology of antibiotic-associated colitis; isolation of Clostridium difficile from the hospital environment.

Authors:  R Fekety; K H Kim; D Brown; D H Batts; M Cudmore; J Silva
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Clostridium difficile in relation to enteric bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  E Falsen; B Kaijser; L Nehls; B Nygren; A Svedhem
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Routine culturing for Clostridium difficile?

Authors:  R A Bowman; T V Riley
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.306

10.  Latex agglutination test for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin in stool samples.

Authors:  M S Shahrabadi; L E Bryan; D Gaffney; S E Coderre; R Gordon; C H Pai
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  15 in total

1.  Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A.

Authors:  K Tsimidis; A E Simor
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Usefulness of culture in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  T V Riley; R A Bowman; C L Golledge
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Clostridium difficile: a pathogen of the nineties.

Authors:  T V Riley
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Laboratory detection of Clostridium difficile in piglets in Australia.

Authors:  Daniel R Knight; Michele M Squire; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Clostridium difficile acquisition rate and its role in nosocomial diarrhoea at a university hospital in Turkey.

Authors:  G Söyletir; A Eskitürk; G Kiliç; V Korten; N Tözün
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Prevalence of gastrointestinal Clostridium difficile carriage in Australian sheep and lambs.

Authors:  Daniel R Knight; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Evaluation of three commercial enzyme immunoassay kits for detecting faecal Clostridium difficile toxins.

Authors:  S A Arrow; L Croese; R A Bowman; T V Riley
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Comparison of three enzyme immunoassays, a cytotoxicity assay, and toxigenic culture for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  F Barbut; C Kajzer; N Planas; J C Petit
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of five cultural procedures for isolation of Clostridium difficile from stools.

Authors:  L M Marler; J A Siders; L C Wolters; Y Pettigrew; B L Skitt; S D Allen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Cross-sectional study reveals high prevalence of Clostridium difficile non-PCR ribotype 078 strains in Australian veal calves at slaughter.

Authors:  Daniel R Knight; Sara Thean; Papanin Putsathit; Stan Fenwick; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.