Literature DB >> 1629327

Rapid detection of the mecA gene in methicillin-resistant staphylococci by enzymatic detection of polymerase chain reaction products.

K Ubukata1, S Nakagami, A Nitta, A Yamane, S Kawakami, M Sugiura, M Konno.   

Abstract

In order to identify methicillin-resistant staphylococci from clinical sources with ease and reliability, enzymatic detection of polymerase chain reaction (ED-PCR) was applied. ED-PCR is based on the capture of amplified products via biotin-streptavidin affinity and the detection of an incorporated hapten in amplified products with an enzyme-linked antibody. In order to identify methicillin-resistant staphylococci of all species, a 150-bp fragment of the mecA gene was targeted for ED-PCR. After PCR was performed with a pair of biotin and dinitrophenol 5'-labeled primers, the reaction mixture was applied to a microtiter well precoated with streptavidin. Thereafter, bound PCR products were detected colorimetrically with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-dinitrophenol antibody. The extraction of DNA from staphylococcal cells for PCR was simplified so that it could be performed within one tube. The total assay, including PCR, took less than 3 h. The sensitivity of mecA gene detection ranged from greater than 5 x 10(2) CFU per tube for Staphylococcus aureus to greater than 5 x 10(3) CFU per tube for Staphylococcus epidermidis. Genotyping results obtained by ED-PCR of 161 tested strains from the colonies (97 strains of S. aureus and 64 strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci) were compared with the phenotypic susceptibilities of the strains to oxacillin. The results of ED-PCR showed excellent agreement with the MICs of oxacillin with very few exceptions; only one strain of S. aureus and two strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci were found to possess the mecA gene, which was discrepant with their phenotypes. Fifty-five blood culture samples were also tested by ED-PCR. For staphylococcal isolates in 33 of the cultures, oxacillin MICs were >4 microgram/ml; 31 of the 33 staphylococcal isolates were determined by ED-PCR to be mecA gene positive. These results suggest that ED-PCR can be used with reasonable confidence in the clinical microbiological laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1629327      PMCID: PMC265371          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.30.7.1728-1733.1992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  25 in total

1.  The expression in Staphylococcus aureus of cloned DNA encoding methicillin resistance.

Authors:  B Inglis; P R Matthews; P R Stewart
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1988-06

2.  Restriction maps of the regions coding for methicillin and tobramycin resistances on chromosomal DNA in methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  K Ubukata; R Nonoguchi; M Matsuhashi; M D Song; M Konno
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Low-affinity penicillin-binding protein associated with beta-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  B J Hartman; A Tomasz
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Multiple mechanisms of methicillin resistance and improved methods for detection in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  H de Lencastre; A M Sá Figueiredo; C Urban; J Rahal; A Tomasz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Homology of mecA gene in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus simulans to that of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  K Ubukata; R Nonoguchi; M D Song; M Matsuhashi; M Konno
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) using polymerase chain reaction amplification.

Authors:  Y Tokue; S Shoji; K Satoh; A Watanabe; M Motomiya
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Identification of methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  K Murakami; W Minamide; K Wada; E Nakamura; H Teraoka; S Watanabe
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Low-level methicillin resistance in strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  H F Chambers; G Archer; M Matsuhashi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Presence of an additional penicillin-binding protein in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Staphylococcus hominis, and Staphylococcus simulans with a low affinity for methicillin, cephalothin, and cefamandole.

Authors:  J Pierre; R Williamson; M Bornet; L Gutmann
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Detection of methicillin resistance in staphylococci by using a DNA probe.

Authors:  G L Archer; E Pennell
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  32 in total

1.  Nonculture prediction of Neisseria meningitidis susceptibility to penicillin.

Authors:  A Antignac; J M Alonso; M K Taha
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Molecular detection of antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  A C Fluit; M R Visser; F J Schmitz
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Antimicrobial agent of susceptibilities and antiseptic resistance gene distribution among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from patients with impetigo and staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome.

Authors:  Norihisa Noguchi; Hidemasa Nakaminami; Setsuko Nishijima; Ichiro Kurokawa; Hiromu So; Masanori Sasatsu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Combinational detection of autolysin and penicillin-binding protein 2B genes of Streptococcus pneumoniae by PCR.

Authors:  K Ubukata; Y Asahi; A Yamane; M Konno
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Preventing antibiotic resistance through rapid genotypic identification of bacteria and of their antibiotic resistance genes in the clinical microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  M G Bergeron; M Ouellette
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Genetic methods for assessing antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  F R Cockerill
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Sensitive and universal method for microbial DNA extraction from blood products.

Authors:  N Golbang; J P Burnie; P E Klapper; A Bostock; P Williamson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  A prospective, randomized study of pefloxacin versus teicoplanin in the treatment of gram-positive coccal infections in cancer patients: early termination due to emergence of resistance to fluoroquinolones.

Authors:  M Aoun; P Van der Auwera; I Varthalitis; A M Bourguignon; M Janssen; D Daneau; F Meunier
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Rapid identification of staphylococcal strains from positive-testing blood culture bottles by internal transcribed spacer PCR followed by microchip gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  Shin-Ichi Fujita; Yasuko Senda; Thikako Iwagami; Takuma Hashimoto
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparison of tests for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a clinical microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  S Unal; K Werner; P DeGirolami; F Barsanti; G Eliopoulos
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.