Literature DB >> 8032706

A prospective, randomized study of pefloxacin versus teicoplanin in the treatment of gram-positive coccal infections in cancer patients: early termination due to emergence of resistance to fluoroquinolones.

M Aoun1, P Van der Auwera, I Varthalitis, A M Bourguignon, M Janssen, D Daneau, F Meunier.   

Abstract

A randomized prospective study comparing pefloxacin to teicoplanin in the treatment of gram-positive infections in cancer patients was prematurely terminated because of the emergence of pefloxacin resistance associated with oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Among 56 patients evaluated for efficacy (26 pefloxacin and 30 teicoplanin) and infected with bacteria susceptible to both antibiotics, the clinical cure and eradication rates were similar for pefloxacin (80.5% and 77.3% respectively) and teicoplanin (66.6% and 52.2% respectively). The relapse rates (15% and 10% for pefloxacin and teicoplanin respectively) and the overall mortalities within 1 month (42% and 31%) were similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8032706     DOI: 10.1007/bf00417480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  29 in total

1.  In vitro activities of new antimicrobial agents against multiresistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from septicemic patients during a Belgian national survey from 1983 to 1985.

Authors:  P Van der Auwera; C Godard; C Denis; S De Maeyer; R Vanhoof
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Emergence of ciprofloxacin resistance in nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Resistance during ciprofloxacin plus rifampin therapy for methicillin-resistant S aureus colonization.

Authors:  L R Peterson; J N Quick; B Jensen; S Homann; S Johnson; J Tenquist; C Shanholtzer; R A Petzel; L Sinn; D N Gerding
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-10

3.  Streptococcal and enterococcal bacteremia in patients with cancer.

Authors:  A Awada; P van der Auwera; F Meunier; D Daneau; J Klastersky
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Widespread quinolone resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a general hospital.

Authors:  I Shalit; S A Berger; A Gorea; H Frimerman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pefloxacin therapy for experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-susceptible or methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  P M Sullam; M G Täuber; C J Hackbarth; H F Chambers; K G Scott; M A Sande
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  W Fan; R del Busto; M Love; N Markowitz; C Cendrowski; J Cardenas; E Quinn; L Saravolatz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Gram-positive infections in granulocytopenic patients: an important issue?

Authors:  C Viscoli; P Van der Auwera; F Meunier
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Randomized study of vancomycin versus teicoplanin for the treatment of gram-positive bacterial infections in immunocompromised hosts.

Authors:  P Van der Auwera; M Aoun; F Meunier
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole compared with vancomycin for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  N Markowitz; E L Quinn; L D Saravolatz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Efficacy and safety of pefloxacin in the treatment of severe infections in patients hospitalized in intensive care units.

Authors:  S Lauwers; W Vincken; A Naessens; D Pierard
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  A survey of the use of teicoplanin in patients with haematological malignancies and solid tumours.

Authors:  J M Davies
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.