Literature DB >> 16292314

Chromatin remodelling at a DNA double-strand break site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Toyoko Tsukuda1, Alastair B Fleming, Jac A Nickoloff, Mary Ann Osley.   

Abstract

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is crucial for maintaining genome stability. Eukaryotic cells repair DSBs by both non-homologous end joining and homologous recombination. How chromatin structure is altered in response to DSBs and how such alterations influence DSB repair processes are important issues. In vertebrates, phosphorylation of the histone variant H2A.X occurs rapidly after DSB formation, spreads over megabase chromatin domains, and is required for stable accumulation of repair proteins at damage foci. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, phosphorylation of the two principal H2A species is also signalled by DSB formation, which spreads approximately 40 kb in either direction from the DSB. Here we show that near a DSB phosphorylation of H2A is followed by loss of histones H2B and H3 and increased sensitivity of chromatin to digestion by micrococcal nuclease; however, phosphorylation of H2A and nucleosome loss occur independently. The DNA damage sensor MRX is required for histone loss, which also depends on INO80, a nucleosome remodelling complex. The repair protein Rad51 (ref. 6) shows delayed recruitment to DSBs in the absence of histone loss, suggesting that MRX-dependent nucleosome remodelling regulates the accessibility of factors directly involved in DNA repair by homologous recombination. Thus, MRX may regulate two pathways of chromatin changes: nucleosome displacement for efficient recruitment of homologous recombination proteins; and phosphorylation of H2A, which modulates checkpoint responses to DNA damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16292314      PMCID: PMC1388271          DOI: 10.1038/nature04148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  29 in total

Review 1.  In vivo cross-linking and immunoprecipitation for studying dynamic Protein:DNA associations in a chromatin environment.

Authors:  M H Kuo; C D Allis
Journal:  Methods       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A in DNA repair.

Authors:  J A Downs; N F Lowndes; S P Jackson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000 Dec 21-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Antagonistic remodelling by Swi-Snf and Tup1-Ssn6 of an extensive chromatin region forms the background for FLO1 gene regulation.

Authors:  A B Fleming; S Pennings
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-09-17       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Transient stability of DNA ends allows nonhomologous end joining to precede homologous recombination.

Authors:  Marie Frank-Vaillant; Stéphane Marcand
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain.

Authors:  Elçin Unal; Ayelet Arbel-Eden; Ulrike Sattler; Robert Shroff; Michael Lichten; James E Haber; Douglas Koshland
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Distinct roles for the RSC and Swi/Snf ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers in DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Bob Chai; Jian Huang; Bradley R Cairns; Brehon C Laurent
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Binding of chromatin-modifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites.

Authors:  Jessica A Downs; Stéphane Allard; Olivier Jobin-Robitaille; Ali Javaheri; Andréanne Auger; Nathalie Bouchard; Stephen J Kron; Stephen P Jackson; Jacques Côté
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex.

Authors:  T Usui; H Ogawa; J H Petrini
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  A chromatin remodelling complex involved in transcription and DNA processing.

Authors:  X Shen; G Mizuguchi; A Hamiche; C Wu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The recombination-deficient mutant RPA (rfa1-t11) is displaced slowly from single-stranded DNA by Rad51 protein.

Authors:  Noriko Kantake; Tomohiko Sugiyama; Richard D Kolodner; Stephen C Kowalczykowski
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  200 in total

1.  BMI1-mediated histone ubiquitylation promotes DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Ismail Hassan Ismail; Christi Andrin; Darin McDonald; Michael J Hendzel
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 2.  Histone-modifying enzymes, histone modifications and histone chaperones in nucleosome assembly: Lessons learned from Rtt109 histone acetyltransferases.

Authors:  Jayme L Dahlin; Xiaoyue Chen; Michael A Walters; Zhiguo Zhang
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 8.250

3.  ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors tune S phase checkpoint activity.

Authors:  Tracey J Au; Jairo Rodriguez; Jack A Vincent; Toshio Tsukiyama
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 4.  Chromatin dynamics and the repair of DNA double strand breaks.

Authors:  Ye Xu; Brendan D Price
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 5.  Mi-2/NuRD complex making inroads into DNA-damage response pathway.

Authors:  Da-Qiang Li; Rakesh Kumar
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  Patching Broken DNA: Nucleosome Dynamics and the Repair of DNA Breaks.

Authors:  Ozge Gursoy-Yuzugullu; Nealia House; Brendan D Price
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Chromatin regulators and their impact on DNA repair and G2 checkpoint recovery.

Authors:  Veronique A J Smits; Ignacio Alonso-de Vega; Daniël O Warmerdam
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Haico van Attikum; Olivier Fritsch; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Transcription of a donor enhances its use during double-strand break-induced gene conversion in human cells.

Authors:  Ezra Schildkraut; Cheryl A Miller; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 10.  Chromatin remodeling at DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Brendan D Price; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.