Literature DB >> 10579938

In vivo cross-linking and immunoprecipitation for studying dynamic Protein:DNA associations in a chromatin environment.

M H Kuo1, C D Allis.   

Abstract

Chromatin structure plays important roles in regulating many DNA-templated processes, such as transcription, replication, and recombination. Considerable progress has recently been made in the identification of large, multisubunit complexes dedicated to these nuclear processes, all of which occur on nucleosomal templates. Mapping specific genomic loci relative to the position of selectively modified or unique histone variants or nonhistone components provides valuable insights into how these proteins (and their modifications) function in their normal chromatin context. Here we describe a versatile and high-resolution method which involves two basic steps: (1) in vivo formaldehyde cross-linking of intact cells followed by (2) selective immunoprecipitation of protein-DNA complexes with specific antibodies. This method allows for detailed analyses of protein-DNA interactions in a native chromatin environment. Recently, this technique has been successfully employed to map the boundaries of specifically modified (e.g., acetylated) histones along target genes, to define the cell cycle-regulated assembly of origin-dependent replication and centromere-specific complexes with remarkable precision, and to map the in vivo position of reasonably rare transcription factors on cognate DNA sites. Thus, the basic chromatin immunoprecipitation technique is remarkably versatile and has now been used in a wide range of cell types, including budding yeast, fly, and human cells. As such, it seems likely that many more studies, centered around chromatin structure and protein-DNA interactions in its native setting, will benefit from this technique. In this article, a brief review of the history of this powerful approach and a discussion of the basic method are provided. Procedures for protein recovery as well as limitations and extensions of the method are also presented. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10579938     DOI: 10.1006/meth.1999.0879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods        ISSN: 1046-2023            Impact factor:   3.608


  235 in total

1.  Developmentally dynamic histone acetylation pattern of a tissue-specific chromatin domain.

Authors:  E C Forsberg; K M Downs; H M Christensen; H Im; P A Nuzzi; E H Bresnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Distribution of acetylated histones resulting from Gal4-VP16 recruitment of SAGA and NuA4 complexes.

Authors:  M Vignali; D J Steger; K E Neely; J L Workman
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  Role of histone acetylation in the assembly and modulation of chromatin structures.

Authors:  A T Annunziato; J C Hansen
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  2000

4.  Ssn6-Tup1 interacts with class I histone deacetylases required for repression.

Authors:  A D Watson; D G Edmondson; J R Bone; Y Mukai; Y Yu; W Du; D J Stillman; S Y Roth
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  The nucleotides responsible for the direct physical contact between the chromatin insulator protein CTCF and the H19 imprinting control region manifest parent of origin-specific long-distance insulation and methylation-free domains.

Authors:  Vinod Pant; Piero Mariano; Chandrasekhar Kanduri; Anita Mattsson; Victor Lobanenkov; Rainer Heuchel; Rolf Ohlsson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Critical role of histone methylation in tumor suppressor gene silencing in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yutaka Kondo; LanLan Shen; Jean-Pierre J Issa
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  Cancer induction and suppression with transcriptional control and epigenome editing technologies.

Authors:  Shota Nakade; Takashi Yamamoto; Tetsushi Sakuma
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  RPD3 is required for the inactivation of yeast ribosomal DNA genes in stationary phase.

Authors:  Joseph J Sandmeier; Sarah French; Yvonne Osheim; Wang L Cheung; Christopher M Gallo; Ann L Beyer; Jeffrey S Smith
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Permissive effects of oxygen on cyclic AMP and interleukin-1 stimulation of surfactant protein A gene expression are mediated by epigenetic mechanisms.

Authors:  Kazi Nazrul Islam; Carole R Mendelson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Dominant mutants of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ASF1 histone chaperone bypass the need for CAF-1 in transcriptional silencing by altering histone and Sir protein recruitment.

Authors:  Beth A Tamburini; Joshua J Carson; Jeffrey G Linger; Jessica K Tyler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-02       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.