Literature DB >> 16291732

An assessment of the utility of the yeast GreenScreen assay in pharmaceutical screening.

J Van Gompel1, F Woestenborghs, D Beerens, C Mackie, P A Cahill, A W Knight, N Billinton, D J Tweats, R M Walmsley.   

Abstract

In this paper we describe an initial reproducibility study of 12 proprietary compounds followed by the assessment of 51 marketed pharmaceuticals and, lastly, a summary of the data so far from 2698 proprietary compounds from the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) compound library, in the yeast GreenScreen assay (GSA). In this assay, a reporter system in the yeast cells employs the DNA damage inducible promoter of the RAD54 gene, fused to the extremely stable green fluorescent protein (GFP). The assay proved to be very robust, the Excel templates provided by Gentronix with the assay interfaced well with in-house J&J systems with little adaptation, the assay was very rapid to perform and used very little compound. The results confirm previous work which suggests that the yeast GSA detects different classes of genotoxic compounds to the Ames assay and as a result can help screen out important genotoxic compounds at the pre-regulatory test phase that are missed by Ames-test-based screens alone. A combination of SAR evaluation of genotoxicity plus an Ames-test-based screen and the GSA provides a powerful pre-regulatory test battery to aid in the selection of successful drug candidates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16291732     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gei062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  5 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of in vitro assays for assessing the toxicity of cigarette smoke and smokeless tobacco.

Authors:  Michael D Johnson; Jodi Schilz; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Jerry R Rice; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  No time to lose--high throughput screening to assess nanomaterial safety.

Authors:  R Damoiseaux; S George; M Li; S Pokhrel; Z Ji; B France; T Xia; E Suarez; R Rallo; L Mädler; Y Cohen; E M V Hoek; A Nel
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 7.790

Review 3.  Metabolic toxicity screening using electrochemiluminescence arrays coupled with enzyme-DNA biocolloid reactors and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Eli G Hvastkovs; John B Schenkman; James F Rusling
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 10.745

4.  Synergistic metabolic toxicity screening using microsome/DNA electrochemiluminescent arrays and nanoreactors.

Authors:  Sadagopan Krishnan; Eli G Hvastkovs; Besnik Bajrami; Dharamainder Choudhary; John B Schenkman; James F Rusling
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  State-of-the-Art Metabolic Toxicity Screening and Pathway Evaluation.

Authors:  Eli G Hvastkovs; James F Rusling
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 6.986

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.