Literature DB >> 16288732

Specific phonological impairments in dyslexia revealed by eyetracking.

Amy S Desroches1, Marc F Joanisse, Erin K Robertson.   

Abstract

Phonological deficits in dyslexia are typically assessed using metalinguistic tasks vulnerable to extraneous factors such as attention and memory. The present work takes the novel approach of measuring phonology using eyetracking. Eye movements of dyslexic children were monitored during an auditory word recognition task in which target items in a display (e.g., candle) were accompanied by distractors sharing a cohort (candy) or rhyme (sandal). Like controls, dyslexics showed slower recognition times when a cohort distractor was present than in a baseline condition with only phonologically unrelated distractors. However, unlike controls, dyslexic children did not show slowed recognition of targets with a rhyme distractor, suggesting they had not encoded rhyme relationships. This was further explored in an overt phonological awareness test of cohort and rhyme. Surprisingly, dyslexics showed normal rhyme performance but poorer judgment of initial sounds on these overt tests. The results implicate impaired knowledge of rhyme information in dyslexia; however they also indicate that testing methodology plays a critical role in how such problems are identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16288732     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  17 in total

1.  Using eye tracking to study numerical cognition: the case of the ratio effect.

Authors:  Rebecca Merkley; Daniel Ansari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Lexical selection differences between monolingual and bilingual listeners.

Authors:  Deanna C Friesen; Ashley Chung-Fat-Yim; Ellen Bialystok
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Investigating the time course of spoken word recognition: electrophysiological evidence for the influences of phonological similarity.

Authors:  Amy S Desroches; Randy Lynn Newman; Marc F Joanisse
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in aphasia: evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Eiling Yee; Sheila E Blumstein; James S Magnuson
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Learning During Processing: Word Learning Doesn't Wait for Word Recognition to Finish.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-07-29

6.  Developmental differences in the influence of phonological similarity on spoken word processing in Mandarin Chinese.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Malins; Danqi Gao; Ran Tao; James R Booth; Hua Shu; Marc F Joanisse; Li Liu; Amy S Desroches
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.

Authors:  Ashley Farris-Trimble; Bob McMurray; Nicole Cigrand; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Individual differences in online spoken word recognition: Implications for SLI.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Vicki M Samelson; Sung Hee Lee; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Test-retest reliability of eye tracking in the visual world paradigm for the study of real-time spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Ashley Farris-Trimble; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Training alters the resolution of lexical interference: Evidence for plasticity of competition and inhibition.

Authors:  Efthymia C Kapnoula; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.