Literature DB >> 16286117

Maximal tumor diameter and the risk of PSA failure in men with specimen-confined prostate cancer.

Tomas Dvorak1, Ming-Hui Chen, Andrew A Renshaw, Marian Loffredo, Jerome P Richie, Anthony V D'Amico.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the maximal tumor diameter (MTD) is significantly associated with the time to postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure.
METHODS: Between 1986 and 2002, 781 men with clinical Stage T1c-T2 prostate cancer underwent radical prostatectomy. The MTD was recorded as the maximal dimension of the largest single focus of cancer from all 3-mm step sections. The median follow-up was 5.4 years (range 0.1 to 14.9); 242 men (31%) experienced PSA failure. A Cox regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of time to postoperative PSA failure. Kaplan-Meier estimates of PSA failure-free survival were made, dichotomized about the median MTD value, and compared using a two-sided log-rank test.
RESULTS: The value of the MTD was significantly associated with the time to PSA failure (adjusted hazard ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.07, P = 0.004), controlling for preoperative PSA level (P < 0.0001), prostatectomy Gleason score (P < 0.0001), and T stage (P < 0.0001). When margin status was added (P = 0.0004), the MTD approached statistical significance (P = 0.07). For patients with a preoperative PSA level of less than 10 ng/mL, prostatectomy Gleason score of 3 + 4 = 7 or less, Stage pT2-T3a, and negative margins, the value of the MTD significantly (P = 0.05) stratified the time to PSA failure, when dichotomized about the median value (13 mm), with 7-year PSA failure estimates of 17% versus 8%.
CONCLUSIONS: Whether patients with traditionally low-risk but large MTD prostate cancer fare better when treated with adjuvant radiotherapy compared with salvage radiotherapy remains to be answered in the setting of a randomized trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16286117     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  4 in total

1.  Maximum tumor diameter adjusted to the risk profile predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Georg Müller; Malte Rieken; Gernot Bonkat; Joel Roman Gsponer; Tatjana Vlajnic; Christian Wetterauer; Thomas C Gasser; Stephen F Wyler; Alexander Bachmann; Lukas Bubendorf
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  In Organ-confined Prostate Cancer, Tumor Quantitation Not Found to Aid in Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence.

Authors:  Yujiro Ito; Emily A Vertosick; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Ying-Bei Chen; Anuradha Gopalan; Sahussapont J Sirintrapun; Satish K Tickoo; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Prostate cancer volume estimations based on transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy in order to predict clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ersin Konyalioglu; Huseyin Tarhan; Ozgur Cakmak; Emel Ebru Pala; Ferruh Zorlu
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

4.  Maximum tumor diameter is not an independent prognostic factor in high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  I M van Oort; J A Witjes; D E G Kok; L A L M Kiemeney; C A Hulsbergen-vandeKaa
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.