Literature DB >> 16284773

Cost-benefit analysis of screening colonoscopy in 40- to 50-year-old first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer.

Markus Menges1, Barbara Gärtner, Thomas Georg, Johannes Fischinger, Martin Zeitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: As shown previously, 40- to 50-year-old first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) have significantly more colorectal adenomas than controls of the same age. Screening colonoscopy of these persons at risk between 40 and 50 years might be cost beneficial.
METHODS: We prepared a detailed cost-benefit analysis of screening colonoscopy and possible repeat endoscopies according to current expenditures for endoscopic procedures in Germany. Since screening colonoscopy is generally offered and reimbursed from 55 years on in Germany, we analysed the period between 45 and 55 years, taking an annual interest rate of 5% into account. Costs were analysed based on the results of a former study [11] depending on various participation rates in a general screening programme.
FINDINGS: Based on the available 1994 figure of about 20,000 euros for diagnosis and treatment of one cancer case, screening colonoscopy is cost beneficial when participation is high. Under a more realistic assumption of currently about 40,000 euros per cancer case, screening colonoscopy is cost beneficial in any case.
INTERPRETATION: Our data support that systematic screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of patients with CRC by the age of 45 years most likely demonstrates an economic benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16284773     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-005-0058-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  15 in total

1.  [Colorectal carcinoma: prevention and early detection in an asymptomatic population--prevention in patients at risk--endoscopic diagnosis, therapy and after-care of polyps and carcinomas. German Society of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases/Study Group for Gastrointestinal Oncology].

Authors:  W Schmiegel; G Adler; P Frühmorgen; U Fölsch; U Graeven; P Layer; S Petrasch; R Porschen; C Pox; T Sauerbruch; H J Schmoll; M Zeitz
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Which colon cancer screening test? A comparison of costs, effectiveness, and compliance.

Authors:  S Vijan; E W Hwang; T P Hofer; R A Hayward
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Screening colonoscopy in 40- to 50-year-old first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer is efficient: a controlled multicentre study.

Authors:  Markus Menges; Johannes Fischinger; Barbara Gärtner; Thomas Georg; Dietrich Woerdehoff; Matthias Maier; Matthias Harloff; Christa Stegmaier; Jochen Raedle; Martin Zeitz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Sonnenberg; F Delcò; J M Inadomi
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Risk related surveillance following colorectal polypectomy.

Authors:  G Nusko; U Mansmann; Th Kirchner; E G Hahn
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Two-year incidence of colon adenomas developing after tandem colonoscopy.

Authors:  L J Hixson; M B Fennerty; R E Sampliner; D L McGee; H Garewal
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Natural history of untreated colonic polyps.

Authors:  S J Stryker; B G Wolff; C E Culp; S D Libbe; D M Ilstrup; R L MacCarty
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  New occurrence and recurrence of neoplasms within 5 years of a screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Benjamin Avidan; Amnon Sonnenberg; Thomas G Schnell; Jack Leya; Adrienne Metz; Stephen J Sontag
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A randomized surveillance study of patients with pedunculated and small sessile tubular and tubulovillous adenomas. The Funen Adenoma Follow-up Study.

Authors:  O D Jørgensen; O Kronborg; C Fenger
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer in patients under 40 years of age.

Authors:  Jyrki T Mäkelä; Heikki Kiviniemi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 2.571

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.