Literature DB >> 16284740

Primary stability of four different implants for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.

J D Agneskirchner1, D Freiling, C Hurschler, P Lobenhoffer.   

Abstract

Since a significant number of implant failures have been reported in association with the procedure of open wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy, the initial biomechanical stability of different fixation devices was investigated in this study. Fifteen third generation Sawbones composite tibiae were used as a model. Four different plates were tested: a short spacer plate (OWO) (n = 4), a short spacer plate with multi-directional locking bolts (MSO) (n = 5), a prototype version of a long spacer plate with multi-directional locking bolts (MSOnew) (n = 2), and a long medial tibia plate fixator with locking bolts (MPF) (n = 4). All opening wedge osteotomies were performed by the same surgeon (PL) in a standardized fashion. Axial compression of the tibiae was performed using a materials testing machine under standardized alignment of the loading axis. Single load to failure tests as well as load-controlled cyclical failure tests were performed. The required force and cycles to failure were recorded. Osteotomy gap motion was measured using linear displacement transducers. Residual stability after failure of the opposite lateral cortex was analysed. Failure occurred at the lateral cortex bone-bride in all tested implants. The rigid long plate fixator (MPF) resisted the greatest amount of force (2,881 N) in the single load to failure tests. In the cyclical load-to-failure tests, the constructs with MPF resisted more than twice the amount of loading cycles when compared to the short spacer plates. The osteotomy gap motion was smallest in the MPF, with a reduction of the displacements of up to 65, 66 and 88%, when compared to OWO, MSO and MSOnew, respectively. The highest residual stability after failure of the lateral cortex was observed in MPF as well. The results suggest that the implant design strongly influences the primary stability of medial opening wedge tibial osteotomy. A rigid long plate fixator with angle-stable locking bolts yields the best results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16284740     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-005-0690-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  14 in total

1.  Primary stability of different implants used in conjunction with high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  C H Flamme; D Kohn; L Kirsch; C Hurschler
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Structural properties of a new design of composite replicate femurs and tibias.

Authors:  A D Heiner; T D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Improvements in surgical technique of valgus high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Philipp Lobenhoffer; Jens D Agneskirchner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-01-11       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Delayed- and non-union following opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: surgeons' results from 182 completed cases.

Authors:  Stuart J Warden; Hayden G Morris; Kay M Crossley; Peter D Brukner; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Open wedge high tibial osteotomy: biomechanical investigation of the modified Arthrex Osteotomy Plate (Puddu Plate) and the TomoFix Plate.

Authors:  Karl Stoffel; Gwidon Stachowiak; Markus Kuster
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  [Open valgus alignment osteotomy of the proximal tibia with fixation by medial plate fixator].

Authors:  P Lobenhoffer; J Agneskirchner; W Zoch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Revision after osteotomy for gonarthrosis. A 10-19-year follow-up of 314 cases.

Authors:  S Odenbring; N Egund; K Knutson; A Lindstrand; S T Larsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1990-04

8.  [Upper tibial osteotomy for gonarthrosis in genu varum. Apropos of a series of 193 cases reviewed 6 to 10 years later].

Authors:  L Lootvoet; A Massinon; R Rossillon; O Himmer; K Lambert; J P Ghosez
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1993

9.  Proximal tibial osteotomy. A critical long-term study of eighty-seven cases.

Authors:  M B Coventry; D M Ilstrup; S L Wallrichs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Medium- and long-term results of high tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis in an agricultural population.

Authors:  P Korovessis; G Katsoudas; P Salonikides; M Stamatakis; A Baikousis
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  75 in total

1.  Differences in fixation stability between spacer plate and plate fixator following high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  D Pape; D Kohn; N van Giffen; A Hoffmann; R Seil; O Lorbach
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Axial and torsional stability of an improved single-plane and a new bi-plane osteotomy technique for supracondylar femur osteotomies.

Authors:  J-M Brinkman; C Hurschler; A E Staubli; R J van Heerwaarden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Axial and torsional stability of supracondylar femur osteotomies: biomechanical comparison of the stability of five different plate and osteotomy configurations.

Authors:  J-M Brinkman; C Hurschler; J D Agneskirchner; D Freiling; R J van Heerwaarden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Locking plate versus non-locking plate in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jae Hwi Han; Hyun Jung Kim; Jae Gwang Song; Jae Hyuk Yang; Ryuichi Nakamura; Daivesh Shah; Young Jee Park; Kyung Wook Nha
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  [Complications of corrective osteotomies around the knee].

Authors:  M Holschen; P Lobenhoffer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  High tibial osteotomy and external fixator.

Authors:  Oguz Cebesoy; Gunhan Karakurum; Omer Arpacioglu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Prospective 5-year survival rate data following open-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Gerrit Bode; Johanna von Heyden; Jan Pestka; Hagen Schmal; Gian Salzmann; Norbert Südkamp; Philipp Niemeyer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Open wedge re-correction high tibial osteotomy in an elderly patient with a varus angulated non-united dome-shaped high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Steffen Schröter; Lukas Konstantinidis; Tobias M Kraus; Fabian Stuby; Ulrich Stöckle; Thomas Freude
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.066

9.  Intramedullary nailing in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy-in vitro test for validation of a method of fixation.

Authors:  Rene Burchard; Denise Katerla; Marina Hammer; Anke Pahlkötter; Christian Soost; Gerhard Dietrich; Arne Ohrndorf; Wolfgang Richter; Markus Lengsfeld; Hans-Jürgen Christ; Jan Adriaan Graw; Claus-Peter Fritzen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  A surrogate long-bone model with osteoporotic material properties for biomechanical testing of fracture implants.

Authors:  Mark B Sommers; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; Steven M Madey; Corey Vande Zanderschulp; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.