Literature DB >> 16284340

Microarray gene expression data with linked survival phenotypes: diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma revisited.

Mark R Segal1.   

Abstract

Diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive malignancy of mature B lymphocytes and is the most common type of lymphoma in adults. While treatment advances have been substantial in what was formerly a fatal disease, less than 50% of patients achieve lasting remission. In an effort to predict treatment success and explain disease heterogeneity clinical features have been employed for prognostic purposes, but have yielded only modest predictive performance. This has spawned a series of high-profile microarray-based gene expression studies of DLBCL, in the hope that molecular-level information could be used to refine prognosis. The intent of this paper is to reevaluate these microarray-based prognostic assessments, and extend the statistical methodology that has been used in this context. Methodological challenges arise in using patients' gene expression profiles to predict survival endpoints on account of the large number of genes and their complex interdependence. We initially focus on the Lymphochip data and analysis of Rosenwald et al. (2002). After describing relationships between the analyses performed and gene harvesting (Hastie et al., 2001a), we argue for the utility of penalized approaches, in particular least angle regression-least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Efron et al., 2004). While these techniques have been extended to the proportional hazards/partial likelihood framework, the resultant algorithms are computationally burdensome. We develop residual-based approximations that eliminate this burden yet perform similarly. Comparisons of predictive accuracy across both methods and studies are effected using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves. These indicate that gene expression data, in turn, only delivers modest predictions of posttherapy DLBCL survival. We conclude by outlining possibilities for further work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16284340     DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  24 in total

1.  Buckley-James boosting for survival analysis with high-dimensional biomarker data.

Authors:  Zhu Wang; C Y Wang
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2010-06-08

2.  Integrating biological knowledge with gene expression profiles for survival prediction of cancer.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Lily Wang
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  The expression of 16 genes related to the cell of origin and immune response predicts survival in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP and rituximab.

Authors:  J-P Jais; C Haioun; T J Molina; D S Rickman; A de Reynies; F Berger; C Gisselbrecht; J Brière; F Reyes; P Gaulard; P Feugier; E Labouyrie; H Tilly; C Bastard; B Coiffier; G Salles; K Leroy
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Survival prediction and gene identification with penalized global AUC maximization.

Authors:  Zhenqiu Liu; Ronald B Gartenhaus; Xue-Wen Chen; Charles D Howell; Ming Tan
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.479

5.  Using cross-validation to evaluate predictive accuracy of survival risk classifiers based on high-dimensional data.

Authors:  Richard M Simon; Jyothi Subramanian; Ming-Chung Li; Supriya Menezes
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 11.622

6.  Semiparametric prognosis models in genomic studies.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Jian Huang; Mingyu Shi; Yang Li; Ben-Chang Shia
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 11.622

7.  An Integrative Pathway-based Clinical-genomic Model for Cancer Survival Prediction.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Lily Wang; Hemant Ishwaran
Journal:  Stat Probab Lett       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 0.870

8.  Sparse Bayesian infinite factor models.

Authors:  A Bhattacharya; D B Dunson
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.445

9.  Survival associated pathway identification with group Lp penalized global AUC maximization.

Authors:  Zhenqiu Liu; Laurence S Magder; Terry Hyslop; Li Mao
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 1.405

10.  Survival prediction from clinico-genomic models--a comparative study.

Authors:  Hege M Bøvelstad; Ståle Nygård; Ornulf Borgan
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.