Literature DB >> 20123942

Semiparametric prognosis models in genomic studies.

Shuangge Ma1, Jian Huang, Mingyu Shi, Yang Li, Ben-Chang Shia.   

Abstract

Development of high-throughput technologies makes it possible to survey the whole genome. Genomic studies have been extensively conducted, searching for markers with predictive power for prognosis of complex diseases such as cancer, diabetes and obesity. Most existing statistical analyses are focused on developing marker selection techniques, while little attention is paid to the underlying prognosis models. In this article, we review three commonly used prognosis models, namely the Cox, additive risk and accelerated failure time models. We conduct simulation and show that gene identification can be unsatisfactory under model misspecification. We analyze three cancer prognosis studies under the three models, and show that the gene identification results, prediction performance of all identified genes combined, and reproducibility of each identified gene are model-dependent. We suggest that in practical data analysis, more attention should be paid to the model assumption, and multiple models may need to be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20123942      PMCID: PMC2905523          DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbp070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  23 in total

1.  Regularized estimation in the accelerated failure time model with high-dimensional covariates.

Authors:  Jian Huang; Shuangge Ma; Huiliang Xie
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Additive risk models for survival data with high-dimensional covariates.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Michael R Kosorok; Jason P Fine
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The additive hazards model with high-dimensional regressors.

Authors:  Torben Martinussen; Thomas H Scheike
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 4.  Survival analysis in public health research.

Authors:  E T Lee; O T Go
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 21.981

5.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume II--The design and analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  N E Breslow; N E Day
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1987

7.  Classification of gene microarrays by penalized logistic regression.

Authors:  Ji Zhu; Trevor Hastie
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.899

8.  Predicting patient survival from microarray data by accelerated failure time modeling using partial least squares and LASSO.

Authors:  Susmita Datta; Jennifer Le-Rademacher; Somnath Datta
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Additive risk survival model with microarray data.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Jian Huang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Flexible boosting of accelerated failure time models.

Authors:  Matthias Schmid; Torsten Hothorn
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  5 in total

1.  Ranking prognosis markers in cancer genomic studies.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Xiao Song
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  Risk Factors of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Yawei Zhang; Ying Dai; Tongzhang Zheng; Shuangge Ma
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2011-11-01

3.  Identification of breast cancer prognosis markers using integrative sparse boosting.

Authors:  S Ma; J Huang; Y Xie; N Yi
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Identification of predictive pathways for non-hodgkin lymphoma prognosis.

Authors:  Xuesong Han; Yang Li; Jian Huang; Yawei Zhang; Theodore Holford; Qing Lan; Nathaniel Rothman; Tongzhang Zheng; Michael R Kosorok; Shuangge Ma
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2010-12-07

5.  Incorporating higher-order representative features improves prediction in network-based cancer prognosis analysis.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Michael R Kosorok; Jian Huang; Ying Dai
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.063

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.