| Literature DB >> 16283491 |
Abstract
This paper seeks to respond to some of the recent criticisms directed toward bioethics by offering a contribution to a "critical bioethics". Here this concept is principally defined in terms of the three features of interdisciplinarity, self-reflexivity and the avoidance of uncritical complicity. In a partial reclamation of the ideas of V.R. Potter, it is argued that a critical bioethics requires a meaningful challenge to culture/nature dualism, expressed in bioethics as the distinction between medical ethics and ecological ethics. Such a contesting of the "bio" in bioethics arrests its ethical bracketing of environmental and animal ethics. Taken together, the triadic definition of a critical bioethics offered here provides a potential framework with which to fend off critiques of commercial capture or of being "too close to science" commonly directed toward bioethics.Keywords: Analytical Approach; Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Philosophical Approach
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16283491 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-004-7812-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Health Care Philos ISSN: 1386-7423