Literature DB >> 12187439

Extending human lifespan and the precautionary paradox.

John Harris1, Søren Holm.   

Abstract

This paper argues that a precautionary approach to scientific progress of the sort advocated by Walter Glannon with respect to life-extending therapies involves both incoherence and irresolvable paradox. This paper demonstrates the incoherence of the precautionary approach in many circumstances and argues that with respect to life-extending therapies we have at present no persuasive reasons for a moratorium on such research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction; Philosophical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12187439     DOI: 10.1076/jmep.27.3.355.2983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  6 in total

Review 1.  Safety, risk and the precautionary principle: rethinking precautionary approaches to the regulation of transgenic plants.

Authors:  Gregory Conko
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Constructing critical bioethics by deconstructing culture/nature dualism.

Authors:  Richard Twine
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2005

3.  Scientific research is a moral duty.

Authors:  John Harris
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  High hopes and automatic escalators: a critique of some new arguments in bioethics.

Authors:  S Holm; T Takala
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Who wants to live forever? Three arguments against extending the human lifespan.

Authors:  Martien A M Pijnenburg; Carlo Leget
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Between same-sex marriages and the Large Hadron Collider: making sense of the precautionary principle.

Authors:  Anton Petrenko; Dan McArthur
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.525

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.