Literature DB >> 12083157

What can the social sciences contribute to the study of ethics? Theoretical, empirical and substantive considerations.

Erica Haimes1.   

Abstract

This article seeks to establish that the social sciences have an important contribution to make to the study of ethics. The discussion is framed around three questions: (i) what theoretical work can the social sciences contribute to the understanding of ethics? (ii) what empirical work can the social sciences contribute to the understanding of ethics? And (iii) how does this theoretical and empirical work combine, to enhance the understanding of ethics, as a field of analysis and debate, is socially constituted and situated? Through these questions the argument goes beyond the now commonly cited objection to the over-simplistic division between normative and descriptive ethics (that assigns the social sciences the 'handmaiden' role of simply providing the 'facts'). In extending this argument, this article seeks to establish, more firmly and in more detail, that: (a) the social sciences have a longstanding theoretical interest analysing the role that a concern with ethics plays in explanations of social change, social organisation and social action; (b) the explanations that are based on the empirical investigations conducted by social scientists exemplify the interplay of epistemological and methodological analyses so that our understanding of particular substantive issues is extended beyond the conventional questions raised by ethicists, and (c) through this combination of theoretical and empirical work, social scientists go beyond the specific ethical questions of particular practices to enquire further into the social processes that lie behind the very designation of certain matters as being 'ethical issues.'

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12083157     DOI: 10.1111/1467-8519.00273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  41 in total

Review 1.  Constructing empirical bioethics: Foucauldian reflections on the empirical turn in bioethics research.

Authors:  Richard E Ashcroft
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-03

Review 2.  Eliciting reasons: empirical methods in priority setting.

Authors:  Andreas Hasman
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-03

3.  Commentary: a sociologist's view on community genetics.

Authors:  Aviad E Raz
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2010-02-25

4.  The public autopsy: somewhere between art, education, and entertainment.

Authors:  A Miah
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Constructing critical bioethics by deconstructing culture/nature dualism.

Authors:  Richard Twine
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2005

6.  Motivating donors to genetic research? Anthropological reasons to rethink the role of informed consent.

Authors:  Klaus Hoeyer; Niels Lynöe
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006

Review 7.  A new prescription for empirical ethics research in pharmacy: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  R J Cooper; P Bissell; J Wingfield
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  'Encounters with experience': empirical bioethics and the future.

Authors:  Jonathan Ives
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-12-14

9.  Research on clinical ethics and consultation. Introduction to the theme.

Authors:  Stella Reiter-Theil; George J Agich
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2007-10-18

10.  The ethical and political evaluation of biotechnology strategies.

Authors:  Juha Räikkä
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2009-01-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.