Literature DB >> 16282175

First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome.

Fergal D Malone1, Jacob A Canick, Robert H Ball, David A Nyberg, Christine H Comstock, Radek Bukowski, Richard L Berkowitz, Susan J Gross, Lorraine Dugoff, Sabrina D Craigo, Ilan E Timor-Tritsch, Stephen R Carr, Honor M Wolfe, Kimberly Dukes, Diana W Bianchi, Alicja R Rudnicka, Allan K Hackshaw, Geralyn Lambert-Messerlian, Nicholas J Wald, Mary E D'Alton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain how best to screen pregnant women for the presence of fetal Down's syndrome: to perform first-trimester screening, to perform second-trimester screening, or to use strategies incorporating measurements in both trimesters.
METHODS: Women with singleton pregnancies underwent first-trimester combined screening (measurement of nuchal translucency, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A [PAPP-A], and the free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin at 10 weeks 3 days through 13 weeks 6 days of gestation) and second-trimester quadruple screening (measurement of alpha-fetoprotein, total human chorionic gonadotropin, unconjugated estriol, and inhibin A at 15 through 18 weeks of gestation). We compared the results of stepwise sequential screening (risk results provided after each test), fully integrated screening (single risk result provided), and serum integrated screening (identical to fully integrated screening, but without nuchal translucency).
RESULTS: First-trimester screening was performed in 38,167 patients; 117 had a fetus with Down's syndrome. At a 5 percent false positive rate, the rates of detection of Down's syndrome were as follows: with first-trimester combined screening, 87 percent, 85 percent, and 82 percent for measurements performed at 11, 12, and 13 weeks, respectively; with second-trimester quadruple screening, 81 percent; with stepwise sequential screening, 95 percent; with serum integrated screening, 88 percent; and with fully integrated screening with first-trimester measurements performed at 11 weeks, 96 percent. Paired comparisons found significant differences between the tests, except for the comparison between serum integrated screening and combined screening.
CONCLUSIONS: First-trimester combined screening at 11 weeks of gestation is better than second-trimester quadruple screening but at 13 weeks has results similar to second-trimester quadruple screening. Both stepwise sequential screening and fully integrated screening have high rates of detection of Down's syndrome, with low false positive rates. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16282175     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa043693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  143 in total

1.  The maternal plasma proteome changes as a function of gestational age in normal pregnancy: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Offer Erez; Eli Maymon; Piya Chaemsaithong; Zhonghui Xu; Percy Pacora; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Bogdan Done; Sonia S Hassan; Adi L Tarca
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Management of abnormal serum markers in the absence of aneuploidy or neural tube defects.

Authors:  William T Schnettler; Michele R Hacker; Rachel E Barber; Sarosh Rana
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2012-03-26

Review 3.  Current situation and development of prenatal diagnosis in China.

Authors:  Xu-Ming Bian; Qi Guo; Qing-Wei Qi
Journal:  Front Med China       Date:  2010-08-10

4.  Digital PCR for the molecular detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy.

Authors:  Y M Dennis Lo; Fiona M F Lun; K C Allen Chan; Nancy B Y Tsui; Ka C Chong; Tze K Lau; Tak Y Leung; Benny C Y Zee; Charles R Cantor; Rossa W K Chiu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy by massively parallel genomic sequencing of DNA in maternal plasma.

Authors:  Rossa W K Chiu; K C Allen Chan; Yuan Gao; Virginia Y M Lau; Wenli Zheng; Tak Y Leung; Chris H F Foo; Bin Xie; Nancy B Y Tsui; Fiona M F Lun; Benny C Y Zee; Tze K Lau; Charles R Cantor; Y M Dennis Lo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Have we done our last amniocentesis? Updates on cell-free DNA for Down syndrome screening.

Authors:  Kathryn J Gray; Louise E Wilkins-Haug
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-03-17

7.  Mid-second Trimester Measurement of Nasal Bone Length in the Indian Population.

Authors:  Bandeppa H Narayani; Prathima Radhakrishnan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-02-22

Review 8.  Cell-Free DNA Screening: Complexities and Challenges of Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Matthew R Grace; Emily Hardisty; Sarah K Dotters-Katz; Neeta L Vora; Jeffrey A Kuller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.347

9.  Iliac crest angle: a novel sonographic parameter for the prediction of Down syndrome risk during the second trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  W Lee; M Balasubramaniam; L Yeo; S S Hassan; F Gotsch; J P Kusanovic; L F Gonçalves; R Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 10.  Noninvasive prenatal testing: the future is now.

Authors:  Errol R Norwitz; Brynn Levy
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.