Literature DB >> 16282000

Deciding who gets treatment for depression and anxiety: a study of consecutive GP attenders.

Julia Hyde1, Jonathan Evans, Debbie Sharp, Tim Croudace, Glynn Harrison, Glyn Lewis, Ricardo Araya.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most research has focused on recognition by GPs of the common mental disorders: depression and anxiety. However, less is known about the factors that determine whether patients with those disorders that are recognised receive any active treatment. AIM: To investigate factors associated with receiving active treatment among consecutive attenders identified by GPs as having a common mental disorder.
SETTING: Data were collected as part of a cluster randomised controlled trial in 30 general practices in the south of Bristol, UK, on the impact of mental health guidelines in primary care.
METHOD: We studied 439 consecutive general practice attenders aged 16-64 years who were given a diagnosis of depression, anxiety, or chronic mixed anxiety and depression by their GP. The main outcome measure was the provision of any active treatment, whether pharmacological or psychological, for these disorders. Patient, GP, and practice level data, including sociodemographic, clinical, and administrative data were explored as predictors in a logistic regression model. Huber White variance estimates were used to account for hierarchical clustering.
RESULTS: Of those patients identified as having a common mental disorder by the GP, 54% were offered active treatment. Higher symptom score, as measured by the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06 to 1.13; P<0.001) and being male (OR = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.09; P = 0.006), were both associated with an increased likelihood of being offered active treatment. Patients with anxiety (OR = 0.24; 95% = CI 0.14 to 0.41; P<0.001), or chronic mixed anxiety/depression (OR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.73; P = 0.003) were less likely to be offered active treatment than those considered to have depression.
CONCLUSION: When deciding to offer active treatment for common mental disorders, GPs appear to be influenced by the severity of symptoms rather than their 'understandability' in relation to recent life stresses or the social context of distress. Further research is needed to investigate why men are more likely and those with an anxiety disorder less likely, to be offered active treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16282000      PMCID: PMC1570785     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  25 in total

Review 1.  Recognition and management of depression in general practice: consensus statement.

Authors:  E S Paykel; R G Priest
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-14

2.  Managing depression in primary care: another example of the inverse care law?

Authors:  Carolyn A Chew-Graham; Sean Mullin; Carl R May; Scott Hedley; Hannah Cole
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.267

3.  Conceptions of depressive disorder and its treatment among 17 Swedish GPs. A qualitative interview study.

Authors:  S J Andersson; M Troein; G Lindberg
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  Depression diagnoses and antidepressant use in primary care practices: a study from the Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet).

Authors:  S Ornstein; G Stuart; R Jenkins
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 0.493

5.  Recent care of common mental disorders in the United States : prevalence and conformance with evidence-based recommendations.

Authors:  P S Wang; P Berglund; R C Kessler
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Who is at risk of nondetection of mental health problems in primary care?

Authors:  S J Borowsky; L V Rubenstein; L S Meredith; P Camp; M Jackson-Triche; K B Wells
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Why are patients prescribed psychotropic drugs by general practitioners? Results of an international study.

Authors:  S Kisely; M Linden; C Bellantuono; G Simon; J Jones
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Sociological influences on antidepressant prescribing.

Authors:  Betsy Sleath; Ya-Chen Tina Shih
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Authors:  A S Zigmond; R P Snaith
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.392

10.  Impact of the ICD-10 Primary Health Care (PHC) diagnostic and management guidelines for mental disorders on detection and outcome in primary care. Cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Tim Croudace; Jonathan Evans; Glynn Harrison; Deborah J Sharp; Ellen Wilkinson; Gemma McCann; Mathew Spence; Catherine Crilly; Lucy Brindle
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.319

View more
  15 in total

1.  Primary care mental health and Alma-Ata: from evidence to action.

Authors:  Gabriel Ivbijaro; Lucja Kolkiewicz; Christos Lionis; Igor Svab; Alan Cohen; Norman Sartorius
Journal:  Ment Health Fam Med       Date:  2008-06

2.  Managing depression in primary care: it's not only what you do it's the way that you do it.

Authors:  Jed Boardman; Paul Walters
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Mental health diagnosis by nurses using the Global Mental Health Assessment Tool: a validity and feasibility study.

Authors:  Vimal K Sharma; Peter Lepping; Murali Krishna; Shazia Durrani; John R M Copeland; Patricia Mottram; Rashmi Parhee; Bennett Quinn; Steven Lane; Anthony Cummins
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Mental health care as delivered by Dutch general practitioners between 2004 and 2008.

Authors:  Peter F M Verhaak; Christel E van Dijk; Jasper Nuijen; Robert A Verheij; Francois G Schellevis
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  Outcomes for depression and anxiety in primary care and details of treatment: a naturalistic longitudinal study.

Authors:  Marijn A Prins; Peter F M Verhaak; Mirrian Hilbink-Smolders; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Miranda G H Laurant; Klaas van der Meer; Harm W J van Marwijk; Brenda W J H Penninx; Jozien M Bensing
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Patient factors associated with SSRI dose for depression treatment in general practice: a primary care cross sectional study.

Authors:  Chris F Johnson; Nadine J Dougall; Brian Williams; Stephen A MacGillivray; Alasdair I Buchanan; Richard D Hassett
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Challenges and implications of routine depression screening for depression in chronic disease and multimorbidity: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Bhautesh Dinesh Jani; David Purves; Sarah Barry; Jonathan Cavanagh; Gary McLean; Frances S Mair
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Stepped care for depression is easy to recommend, but harder to implement: results of an explorative study within primary care in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Marleen L M Hermens; Anna Muntingh; Gerdien Franx; Peter T van Splunteren; Jasper Nuyen
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Explaining the rise in antidepressant prescribing: a descriptive study using the general practice research database.

Authors:  Michael Moore; Ho Ming Yuen; Nick Dunn; Mark A Mullee; Joe Maskell; Tony Kendrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-10-15

10.  Patient factors associated with guideline-concordant treatment of anxiety and depression in primary care.

Authors:  Marijn A Prins; Peter F M Verhaak; Mirrian Smolders; Miranda G H Laurant; Klaas van der Meer; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Harm W J van Marwijk; Brenda W J H Penninx; Jozien M Bensing
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.