Literature DB >> 10678342

Depression diagnoses and antidepressant use in primary care practices: a study from the Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet).

S Ornstein1, G Stuart, R Jenkins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We examined the pharmacologic management and follow-up of adults with newly diagnosed depression, and the use of antidepressants among patients not diagnosed with depression in primary care practice. A total of 389 physicians in 39 practices in the Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet), a national network of primary care physicians provided data for the study.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study for the year 1996 using demographic, contact, diagnosis, and prescription data available in the December 1997 PPRNet database. We identified patients with new diagnoses of depression from the problem lists in the electronic medical record. Psychopharmacologic agents prescribed within 5 days of the diagnosis, follow-up contacts within 6 months of the diagnosis, and diagnoses of patients prescribed antidepressants without a new diagnosis of depression were also identified. We performed descriptive analyses for all practices and for individual practices.
RESULTS: During 1996, there were 149,327 active adult patients in the 39 participating practices. Of the 131,141 patients without a history of depression or antidepressant prescription, 2103 (1.6%) had a new diagnosis of depression in 1996. Incidence among the 39 practices ranged from 0.4% to 4.0%. Forty-nine percent of the newly diagnosed patients received an antidepressant prescription within 5 days of diagnosis; 81% of the prescriptions were for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Ninety percent of the patients prescribed antidepressants had at least one contact in the 6 months after diagnosis (mean = 5.3 contacts). One third of the patients who had not begun antidepressants within 5 days of their diagnoses started taking one by the end of 1996. Among the 149,327 active patients, 6.3% received a prescription for an antidepressant in 1996. More than 40% of these patients had never been diagnosed with depression.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the high prevalence and wide interpractice variations of diagnosing depression and prescribing antidepressants in primary care. Follow-up of patients newly diagnosed with depression was common and consistent with published guidelines. Opportunities for increased detection and treatment of depression exist in approximately half of the study practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10678342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  11 in total

1.  Guideline adherence rates and interprofessional variation in a vignette study of depression.

Authors:  H Tiemeier; W J de Vries; M van het Loo; J P Kahan; N Klazinga; R Grol; H Rigter
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-09

2.  Off-licence prescribing and regulation in psychiatry: current challenges require a new model of governance.

Authors:  Philip Sugarman; Amy Mitchell; Catherine Frogley; Geoffrey L Dickens; Marco Picchioni
Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-08

3.  Using electronic medical records to determine the diagnosis of clinical depression.

Authors:  Nhi-Ha T Trinh; Soo Jeong Youn; Jessica Sousa; Susan Regan; C Andres Bedoya; Trina E Chang; Maurizio Fava; Albert Yeung
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.046

4.  Decreased suicidal ideation in depressed patients with or without comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: an open study.

Authors:  Leo Sher; Barbara H Stanley; Kelly Posner; Mikkel Arendt; Michael F Grunebaum; Yuval Neria; Joseph John Mann; Maria A Oquendo
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.222

5.  Deciding who gets treatment for depression and anxiety: a study of consecutive GP attenders.

Authors:  Julia Hyde; Jonathan Evans; Debbie Sharp; Tim Croudace; Glynn Harrison; Glyn Lewis; Ricardo Araya
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Antidepressant drug use in general practice: inter-practice variation and association with practice characteristics.

Authors:  Dorte Gilså Hansen; Jens Søndergaard; Werner Vach; Lars Freng Gram; Jens-Ulrik Rosholm; Jakob Kragstrup
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Why do general practitioners prescribe antidepressants to their patients? A pilot study.

Authors:  Alain Mercier; Isabelle Auger-Aubin; Jean-Pierre Lebeau; Matthieu Schuers; Pascal Boulet; Paul Van Royen; Lieve Peremans
Journal:  Biopsychosoc Med       Date:  2014-07-30

8.  Depression, Comorbidities, and Prescriptions of Antidepressants in a German Network of GPs and Specialists with Subspecialisation in Anthroposophic Medicine: A Longitudinal Observational Study.

Authors:  Elke Jeschke; Thomas Ostermann; Horst C Vollmar; Manuela Tabali; Harald Matthes
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Physician attitude toward depression care interventions: implications for implementation of quality improvement initiatives.

Authors:  Rachel Mosher Henke; Ann F Chou; Johann C Chanin; Amanda B Zides; Sarah Hudson Scholle
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Treatment-resistant depression in primary care across Canada.

Authors:  Sakina J Rizvi; Etienne Grima; Mary Tan; Susan Rotzinger; Peter Lin; Roger S Mcintyre; Sidney H Kennedy
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.356

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.