Literature DB >> 16279909

Performance characteristics and evaluation of an automated-developed and quantitative, immunochemical, fecal occult blood screening test.

Alex Vilkin1, Paul Rozen, Zohar Levi, Amal Waked, Eran Maoz, Shlomo Birkenfeld, Yaron Niv.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Guaiac fecal occult blood colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests (FOBT) are faulted for low sensitivity and nonspecificity for human hemoglobin (Hb). Automated-developed, immunochemical, human Hb FOBT (I-FOBT) is specific, eliminates diet restrictions, and Hb quantification allows selection of a threshold for colonoscopy. Aims were to determine 1) test reproducibility; 2) test stability; 3) intrapatient daily I-FOBT variation; 4) test sensitivity and specificity for neoplasia in 500 symptomatic/high-risk patients undergoing colonoscopy; and 5) to correlate fecal Hb measurements with findings.
METHODS: The desktop instrument OC-Sensor (Eiken, Japan) automatically develops and quantitates 50 tests/h for Hb. Patients prepared three tests, which were quantified and then 1) repeatedly re-examined; 2) stored at 4 degrees C or 20 degrees C or 28 degrees C and repeatedly examined; and 3) fecal Hb levels were correlated with colonoscopic findings.
RESULTS: Five I-FOBTs re-examined five times in 1 day had no significant measurement changes. Thirty tests stored for 21 or more days had a decay/day of 0.3%+/- 0.4 at 4 degrees C (NS), 2.2%+/- 1.7 at 20 degrees C (NS), and 3.7%+/- 1.8 at 28 degrees C (p < 0.05). There were intrapatient variations between the three daily I-FOBTs (NS). At the recommended 100 ng Hb/mL threshold, all six cases of CRCs and 20 out of 28 cases of advanced adenomas were detected; evaluated together their sensitivity and specificity were 76.5% and 95.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: Desktop, automated-developed, quantitative I-FOBT is now available. Refrigerated OC-Sensor samples are stable for 21 days, easy to prepare and develop and, at the 100 ng Hb/mL threshold, have high sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values for significant neoplasia. Suitability for population CRC screening awaits further evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16279909     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00231.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  41 in total

Review 1.  Screening for colorectal cancer: established and emerging modalities.

Authors:  Nikhil Pawa; Tan Arulampalam; John D Norton
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Performance of the fecal immunochemical test is not decreased by high ambient temperature in the rapid return system.

Authors:  Jae Myung Cha; Joung Il Lee; Kwang Ro Joo; Hyun Phil Shin; Jae Jun Park; Jung Won Jeun; Jun Uk Lim; Sang-Hyun Hwang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Effectiveness of the immunofecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening in a large population.

Authors:  Haiyun Yang; Zhizheng Ge; Jun Dai; Xiaobo Li; Yunjie Gao
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Cancer: What is the best screening test for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Jean Faivre
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 5.  Fecal DNA testing for colorectal cancer screening: Molecular targets and perspectives.

Authors:  Amaninder Dhaliwal; Panagiotis J Vlachostergios; Katerina G Oikonomou; Yitzchak Moshenyat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-10-15

Review 6.  Screening tests for colorectal cancer: a menu of options remains relevant.

Authors:  James E Allison; Michael Lawson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Ulcerative colitis patients in clinical remission demonstrate correlations between fecal immunochemical test results, mucosal healing, and risk of relapse.

Authors:  Asuka Nakarai; Jun Kato; Sakiko Hiraoka; Shiho Takashima; Daisuke Takei; Toshihiro Inokuchi; Yuusaku Sugihara; Masahiro Takahara; Keita Harada; Hiroyuki Okada
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; Thomas Rösch; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Screening for colorectal cancer: random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing at different cut-off levels.

Authors:  L Hol; J A Wilschut; M van Ballegooijen; A J van Vuuren; H van der Valk; J C I Y Reijerink; A C M van der Togt; E J Kuipers; J D F Habbema; M E van Leerdam
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Cutoff value determines the performance of a semi-quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood test in a colorectal cancer screening programme.

Authors:  L G M van Rossum; A F van Rijn; R J F Laheij; M G H van Oijen; P Fockens; J B M J Jansen; A L M Verbeek; E Dekker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.